I want to ask if any of you good people believe the propaganda on thw W.T.C 9/11?

Question

Do you think our own government (ie)the white house is responsable for the whole thing? ive seen "in plane sight" and have no doubts!! see it if you havent and let me know if i am wrong!!

Answer 1

Personally, i think its bush's fault. in his inaguration speech, he stated that he would keep the US out of war, and out of other countrie's business. then, what does he do? he involves himself in other countries' business and starts a war!

Answer 2

I watched Loose Change and initially was willing to consider some of the "evidence" the producers came up with but they
were too vague. They claim Mohammad Atta spoke to his father 2 days after 9/11 but offered no proof. That the dogs they send into the Twin Towers each day to sniff for bombs weren't allowed in the day before and the day of 9/11. That you can't call people from a phone in a plane but one guy called his own mother to say a final goodbye and identified himself by his first and LAST name. Strangely, Mom wasn't in the movie to verify this and how did she get the call if you can't call people from a plane? No plane struck the Pentagon according to these guys and no human remains were found. So where are all these people? Hiding from their families for the fun of it. Propaganda works two ways.

Answer 3

hisorically governments have used attacks on their own population as a reason to go to war. Today, our technology is so advanced that it can be used for our good, or used to decieve people.

Dozens of people in and around the building, and news reporters there that day of 9/11 heard explosions coming from the floor of the towers. As i reviewed the coverage of that day, i could also hear the explosions.

Not many people know that building seven was purposely taken down that day either and do not know what was in building seven. The building had no structural damage that would cause it to collapse.

Has anyone heard president bush talk about a new workd order, and also tell people not to believe the conspiracy theories. Ive been reading and studying psychology, sociology, semantics, linguistics and body language for over ten years now. i knew clinton was a little weasle and i turned out to be right. He was a pathological lier. "Telling people" not to believe conspiracy theories out of the blue, is just like a predator telling the victim "out of the blue" ......that you can trust me. then the victim follows him to his own death.

Answer 4

If such a thing had happened, the democrats in Congress would have already seized upon it, held hearings, gotten the "proof" before the public, impeached the President, gotten him tried and convicted for High Treason.

Historically, it would have meant the once-and-for-all End of the Republican party. They wouldn't be able to win a dog-catcher's election if they were proven to be a party that com mitted treason.

Instead, they suffered an huge defeat anyway, based on the scandals and disapproval for the way the war is being handled. (This was for standing by their principles in spite of growing public disapproval...unlike those who would insult our troops or deny them the funds to protect themselves.)

Honestly, No politician would be stupid enough as to conceive, plan and committ such an atrocity against the American electorate.

These movies and books exist as a paranoid outlet and an attempt to frighten voters by demonizing those that disagree with them.

Answer 5

9/11 Conspiracy films are a dime a dozen.

After reading the Popular Mechanics article:

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

I have plenty of doubts.

Answer 6

Our moronic government doesn't have the intelligence to pull something like that off. It would take thousands of people all working together in perfect unity and secrecy to pull something like that off. Someone would've talked by now.

Answer 7

Have you ever considered that 911 conspiracy films are the propaganda you should be questioning?

Answer 8

any old propaganda or that particular bit of propaganda?