English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

she could be carrying anything to terrorist clients.

2006-11-08 01:03:26 · 5 answers · asked by joseph m 4 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

5 answers

She would have to show her face to compare with the photo ID, and for her image to be captured on camera at most prisons, as well as give her fingerprints and consent to be searched. Even police and probation officers undergo this every time they visit someone in prison.

2006-11-08 09:17:41 · answer #1 · answered by purplepadma 3 · 0 0

It is time these stupid bloody Muslim women realised that it is not a religious requirement to wear the niquab. It is only a relic of their customs of when they were nomadic tribes in the desert. They should conform to our way of life of being able to see and read the face of the person we are talking to. I'm not anti niquab per se! but these women are just trying to make a statement of their culture and are not trying to integrate with the citizens of this country. In fact many Arab countries forbid them to wear the niquab in official capacities.

2006-11-08 01:19:33 · answer #2 · answered by hakuna matata 4 · 2 0

Niqabs are no excuse for submitting to security requirements, nor for proving identity.

Would you get into a taxi driven by someone in a niqab whose hack license you could not confirm?

X rays are not used on living people and animals for security purposes. Magnetometers are. She is entitled to be frisked in a sheltered area by a female guard.

Of some interest in this sense are the new machines, being tested experimentally, that enable the operator to see exact outlines of the human body, including sex parts.

2006-11-08 01:15:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

she would have to remove the veil from her face to prove she is who she says she is and also would undergo all security checks everyone else has to go through - No special privileges

2006-11-08 01:05:49 · answer #4 · answered by Monica 6 · 0 0

She should have been held in contempt of court and jailed!

2006-11-08 01:07:58 · answer #5 · answered by kbw 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers