To me....this is not a question of a woman running.....Senator Clinton is the best candidate for the Presidency of the US....just look at the would be Rep candidates and the other Dem candidates...they pale in comparison to her....I hope she does run and wins.....
2006-11-08 01:20:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by DaHBIC 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
There is so much people have to say about Hillary Rodham Clinton for and against, that at least she is one of the most interesting potential candidates. Of course being the wife of a former President helps and hurts her at the same time and that's unfair actually, on both counts.
One of the worst knocks against her I think, are the many countless stories and testimony from former aides, staff and associates who describe her as a vicious, nasty, criminally dishonest, conniving person who literally will say or do ANYTHING which she thinks she can get away with. That's the clincher for me. Man OR woman, we've already had WAY more than enough of that type of personality in government.........
2006-11-08 00:36:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
A woman president will happen eventually, it is evitable. I am a democrat, and I can see Hillary running for president, but winning it is a different story. So many hillbillies and people who have never voted in their life, will vote, just so she wont win. Mainly men....this is just what I was told by my history teacher in high school. Number one because she is woman, and number two she has been very contradicting. Could be wrong though. Women outnumber men, so if everybody voted and the majority of women were on her side, there would be no competition.
2006-11-07 23:59:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by kurious kat 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
I, for one don't think she should be elected 'just because she is a woman'. People are so focused on that, it's sickening. Female politicians are dirtier than male politicians - despite what the majority of people in the general public think. She is no exception. That being said, she is a crafty one and probably wouldn't do any more damage than has already been done by past presidents.
2006-11-07 23:57:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by empress_pam 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
She is a strong, intelligent woman that is not afraid to stand up for what she feels is the right thing to do. She would have one of the best advisers in the world in her husband, the last president to be legally elected and he was probably the best at the job of running the business of the country in the last 40 years. She would be an excellent choice for president as I see it.
2006-11-07 23:55:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I think she should run. It would be interesting to see how the american people would split on that one.She for sure would have to be better than what we have now !!! Imagine her against OBAMA. A woman / black man. wouldn`t that be a day for making history ?? Personally I`d vote vote either one of the before I`d see another BUSH in office. Imagine president Clinton and visa president Obama. HA HA ( I don`t even know what party he is ) But wouldn`t that be a trip. It would have to be better than a bunch of corrupt child molesters.
2006-11-08 00:02:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
John McCain's employed mouth (Sarah Palin) ought to be a Barack Obama plant. The extra she talks the extra effective Obama does. you could anticipate Hillary Clinton working returned in 2012 together with her "I instructed you so" marketing campaign. HRC2012
2016-12-14 03:34:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by suire 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
She should be elected because she's very intelligent, she has proven that she is very dedicated and hard working. Also, while her husband was president, the economy flourished, the national debt was cut and we even had a surplus (which btw, the bushes have squandered). We had good relations with many other countries, and America was on its way to again be where we should be. They make a perfect political team.
2006-11-07 23:53:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by mstrywmn 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
If she runs I hope she's elected because she will have the best political adviser any president has had in quite some time .
2006-11-08 00:05:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
The USA has to stop trying to establish dynasties.
Look at the trouble we have with two Bushs. It would be even worse if we had two Clintons.
The best way the D's can assure another Republican president is to have Hillery as a candidate.
2006-11-08 00:02:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by Paul K 6
·
1⤊
1⤋