Bring back the death sentence in the U.K?

Question

Surely its time to bring back the death sentence for murderers and terrorists and the like?

Why should we have to pay to keep these evil people in relative comfort for the rest of thier days?.

Answer 1

With DNA evidence, we have no excuses for NOT implementing capital punishment. If we cannot have this, then life should mean life, not 15 years of Playstations and pool tables. I truly feel that is only supporters of capital punishment who place true value on the life of the victims.

Answer 2

you're repeating quite a few prevalent misconceptions. in the starting up, that is virtually not conceivable to instruct someone is 100% responsible - that is the reason juries are steered to be confident previous all life like doubt. Ask any police officer, and he will inform you that they are by no potential 100% confident about someone they placed on trial. Secondly, DNA is a wide help to the police, besides the undeniable fact that it doesn't instruct who committed a criminal offense. no human being has ever, or will ever, be prosecuted on DNA information on my own. DNA proves you've been, faster or later, on the scene, besides the undeniable fact that it doesn't instruct you've been the single which did the crime. Thirdly, that is been proved time and time again that the shortcoming of existence penalty isn't any genuine deterrent. look on the u . s . - they have the shortcoming of existence penalty, yet nonetheless have very severe homicide prices. besides, many crimes like homicide are 'of the prompt' (i.e. they don't look idea by, so deterrents do not make sure contained in the minds of the criminal) or are committed by psychopaths, who again do not a lot evaluate what the punishment will be in the journey that they are stuck. contained in the previous, there have been mistakes. innocuous everybody is wrongly convicted, and later released from reformatory even as new information or information turns into accessible, now and again many years later. If that human being were killed, then an innocuous human being might want to have died - you may launch people from reformatory, yet you won't be able to convey them decrease back to existence. One innocuous lack of existence can make a mockery of the total device. you won't be able to instruct guilt 100%, and it isn't a lot of a deterrent. No, enable murderers, rapists etc. rot in reformatory for something else of their lives.

Answer 3

If it weren't for the incompetence of our justice system and all the mistakes that were made, I would totally agree with you, however, compensation would have to be given in wrong instances, and that would come out of our own pockets. What I feel would be a little better would simply be to cut the luxuries of British prisons. If you go to prisons abroad, they literally get 1 hour out of cells a day, and a piece of bread with some water if their lucky.

Why should they be given anything more than this? Make it a prison instead of a hotel. My partner spent a couple of months inside many years ago, when he was on the wrong path, and for him he said he almost didn't want to leave because he got a comfy bed, 3 hot meals a day and a gym to use.
Take this away, give them a cheap mattress, some gruel and bread and water, then see how much the penal system would save in cash. Put people off wanting to go to prison thats the idea!

Answer 4

In principle I absolutely agree.

However, what about all the miscarriages of justice?

The Birmingham 5, or however many there were?
Last week some guy was helping police with their enquires fro a murder 30 odd years ago. Someone had already been convicted but then released on appeal after serving 15 years, he would have been executed if we had capital punishment.

Can you imagine the compensation claims from family?

I for one am not prepared to pay yet more tax to pay for this.

Answer 5

The death penalty institutionalises brutality: it could be argued that the criminals deserve this; but it is impossible to have a death penalty without executioners and those involved with the care of prisoners on death row, and the death penalty inevitibly brutalises these people.

The death penalty has never been shown to reduce future crime.

With all the appeals involved it would not be much/any cheaper than keeping the criminals in prison.

Last but not least, there is always the possiblility that there has been a miscarriage of justice. If you execute someone it is too late.

Answer 6

i totally agree, and I'm sure most people would! serial rapists, murderers, paedophiles, child abusers, etc should all have the right to live removed. they are not safe when they released, most re offend and why the bloody hell should I and other decent human beings be paying for them to eat three decent meals a day, be clothed, have fags, be educated (never works), and be warm when the elderly of this country are struggling to pay for one if not all of the above. bloody scanderlous

to add to the comment of the bloke above who says what about the people who were given it then found to be not guilty, then id like to say, this is different now we have dna, in those days such things we not available, when dna is involved and their is no question of doubt then of course serious offenders should be given the death penalty

Answer 7

The problem is a lot of innocent people get executed by the state if you have the death penalty, why not make sure that if a life sentence is passed it means life not a few years

Answer 8

Tell me, is there some crime that you would commit if the penalty were life in prison, but not if it was death? The only people for whom this makes any difference is terrorists - they WANT to be put to death, so they can become martyrs and get to their 77 virgins faster.
And if you think prison is comfortable, I urge you to give it a try. Losing your liberty and basic human dignity is an adequate deterent for anyone who is not criminally insane.

If not wanting to pay for someone is the only justification we need for killing them, then how about executing all pensioners, while we're at it?

Answer 9

Chancer,

One man has died recently after being released from Jail after nearly 20 years for a crime he did not commit. When the death sentence was the norm in England, people were executed for crimes they did not commit. How do you comfort the families of those people ? Thast why the death sentnce in England was booted into history. I hear your argument for it in the case of Terrorists and I actually agree with you, but the same miscarriages of justice can happen. Sad.

Answer 10

I can't agree with you although I can understand your point. Watch the Krzysztof Kieslowski film 'A Short Film about Killing' - the film shows a senseless, violent, almost botched murder followed by a cold, calculated, flawlessly performed execution. One is performed by a young Polish man the other by the Polish state - neither can in any way be justified.