2006-11-07 21:50:27 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
You have changed your picture Crispy! I preferred the 18th. Century look....
No he wouldn't of. He would have had the same fate as Rudolf Hess: in solitary for thirty odd years and then die mysteriously when somebody wanted to build a supermarket on the site...
2006-11-07 23:22:02 · answer #1 · answered by 13caesars 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No! As the latest Old Bailey 'al Queda' court decision shows, he would have been given a minimum of 40 years in jail before being considered for release. And since he is in late middle age it would have been a true life sentence.
2006-11-07 22:03:29 · answer #2 · answered by avian 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Very cynical of you to suggest Saddam would have got off so lightly!.. I think he would have got what he deserves life in imprisonment without hope of release...
2006-11-08 02:29:04 · answer #3 · answered by robert x 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He would have been given a house, a job in the government and told to look after himself while we decided what to do with him!!
2006-11-07 22:02:05 · answer #4 · answered by kerrykinsmalosevich 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The way our legal system is, it wouldn't surprise me.
Actually, he'd get life imprisonment, but be out in 10 for good behaviour.
2006-11-07 23:28:16 · answer #5 · answered by genghis41f 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Even our legal system isn't that bad! but I can see how easy it is to loose faith in a once great system.
2006-11-07 22:06:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
properly live in the Palace with the royals
2006-11-07 22:18:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would'nt surprise me in the least.
2006-11-08 05:22:54 · answer #8 · answered by Roxy. 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes and training for a proper job.
2006-11-07 21:54:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
probebly ... also a free flat and milk tokens !
2006-11-07 21:52:17 · answer #10 · answered by ? 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋