in account of cruelty bush > saddam " true or false?

Answer 1

well, I think bush should be prosecuted for killing WAY more than 150 our troops, and using 9/11 as a catalyst for hunting a man that was no threat whatsoever to us U.S. citizens, while letting the man responsible 'escape'.

Answer 2

As far as killing innocent people are concerned Mr. Bush is no smaller a criminal than Mr. Saddam. So, I would rate Saddam=Bush.

And If the U N has some rights and has some shame left with it. It should take some serious actions regarding convicting Mr. Bush as well.

Answer 3

Let us say that Saddam is known to be gratefull towards people who were kind to him during his childhood. So in account of cruelty, Mad Albright > Saddam.

Answer 4

False, Saddam is an evil sadistic person who in no way or form compares to any U.S. president. Bush has made some mistakes during his presidency, but that is no different than any other president. He did what everyone wanted to do after the attacks on our country, he chased those bastards down and brought terror to their homes.

Answer 5

this is genuine the Bush related Saddam to 9-11 out of context and replaced into later compelled to admit it. It replaced into **** Cheney who suggested later “ i do no longer think and characteristic never seen any info to verify Hussein replaced into in touch in 9-11. We had that reporting for awhile, regardless of if it relatively is going to easily grew to become out to be untrue�. because of the fact then distinctive of the Bush administration have admitted they have been given it incorrect the only debate left to have is why they have been given maximum of issues incorrect approximately between the main substantial judgements of the generations. In all their glory the Bush administration made allegations implying alliances that have because of the fact been disproved. while puzzled on the situation downplayed the failures of his administration to get the intelligence good yet argued it replaced into nevertheless a sturdy thought of carry a pair of regime exchange in Iraq. This replaced into the sturdy repackaging of our motives for being different their from an drawing close threat to triumphing hearts for democracy. In 2005 Bush admitted “ this is genuine that many of the intelligence to bypass into Iraq conflict incorrect�, he customary duty for those blunders yet then in a change of hand created a sparkling and proper clarification for troops to proceed on until eventually they have been unfastened and Iraq democratic. Many having because of the fact left the administration have admitted the blunders of this connection and greater than a number of different allegations made against Saddam as clarification for the preliminary invasion and eventual regime exchange. The used the allegation of immanent threat according to Saddam and his now disproved nuclear application. They then related Saddam with 9-11 as info he ought to attain the united states and for this reason gained sentiment for the invasion. It replaced into rooted in previous and defective intelligence the two factors now disproved even with administration assurances given on the time to their being irrefutable certainty.

Answer 6

Thats like asking who is better looking between Brad Pitt and Angelina. The two are one. Almost as if joined in holy matrimony.

Answer 7

Saddam kill thousands to ten of thousands. Bush's solider killed on 1500. very good record

Answer 8

It's damn true. I think they are equal in terms of cruelity

Answer 9

both give lipservise to the geneva conventions

Answer 10

=