No. That would be illegal discrimination.
But a foreigner who does not have a green card or a permanent-type (i.e., indefinitely renewable) visa cannot have homestead rights in Florida property. This is relevant to bankruptcy exemptions and to debt collection.
That's a different issue, and might have led to the confusion.
"Illegal aliens" are not often found as holders of title (owners) of HOA property. Canadian snowbirds are. They are not required to have visas to spend up to six months a year in the USA (most would not wish to stay longer for income and estate tax reasons anyway). It might be a violation of their treaty rights (US-Canada treaties dating back to the Jay Treaty, 1794, now best known for giving First Canadians (Canadian "Indians") the right to live and work in the USA without visas; most recently NAFTA) to discriminate against them.
2006-11-07 21:25:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I admire your math skills. i do no longer think of math is the subject, nevertheless. #a million The Dem party can no longer enable those politicians get away with what they did. right here that's: The politicians in FL & MI have been warned to no longer carry their elections early or they might not count extensive type. Why did they do it?? by using fact, they wanted to regulate the momentum of the marketing campaign. They calculated the possibility and went forward with their plan. #2 it is not truthful to all those voters who did no longer take place by using fact they thought their votes did no longer count extensive type. Why no longer revote? there have been Clinton supporters who presented to pay for it. #3 in this u . s ., we don't purchase and sell elections. If the Clintons and supporters paid for FL & MI revotes, they might truly be "procuring" votes. voters might experience "appreciative" and that's no longer a point enjoying field. Plus . . . #3 it is not truthful to all those voters who have been able to solid their votes on the time, yet for despite reason are actually unable to revote now. (case in point: my mom who grew to become into dieing of maximum cancers yet stayed alive in order that she ought to vote against GWB.) #4 Clinton agreed, Obama agreed - or maybe FL & MI knew - that those votes would not rely. Nor ought to they. Do i've got faith unhappy for the voters? sure, I do, extremely and not by using fact i'm an Obama supporter. What they are able to do now could be undergo in recommendations what their politicians did to them AND VOTE for this reason interior the subsequent ELECTION. Edit: Sorry - there are 2 #3's in there. See, I informed you I respected your math skills. :)
2016-12-28 15:51:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's completely legal as long as the associations bylaws says that it is legal. However, if the person is an illegal alien, then the association bylaws may say something about that. Read your bylaws book.
2006-11-07 20:57:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by TrainerMan 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Are they Homeowners? or does it say only white American owners?
2006-11-07 20:57:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Powerpuffgeezer 5
·
0⤊
0⤋