Don't worry; CNN's already taken care of that.
2006-11-07 18:26:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7
·
4⤊
4⤋
Neither. If you want to send a hand-written, engraved, or any other form of invitation to any terrorist, then you are clearly one to be on Bush's list of people to wiretap, under suspicion for being unpatriotic, revealing a treasonous heart.
My impression, is you are taking it pretty hard that Republicans lost control. You may thank your Republican leaders for their stance on the issues. It seems that failed leadership has finally come to light after 6 years of Stay the Course on the tough issues.
2006-11-08 03:40:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by Schona 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Oh please - the president is still in control of foreign policy. And remember, terrorists killed 200 marines when Reagan was in office, blew up the Pan Am plane when Bush was in office, and attacked the WTC and Pentagon when Bush Jr was ignoring the warning signs at his acreage (not ranch) in Texas. There is no correlation between likelihood of an attack and party in power - except that Bush has enraged formerly moderate Muslims and made another attack more likely in the long run.
2006-11-08 03:43:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dunrobin 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
wah wah wah
send whatever you want...terrorist don't care about party affiliation and the creation of homeland security has proven to be a big inefficient system under bush that got a big fat F from the 9/11 commission. Dems wanted the commision, Bush did not. So who has our national security as a top priority? We didn't catch bin laden, there were mo WMD in Iraq, Hussein wasn't a terrorist, just a ruthless dictator, and for every innocent civilian we kill in Iraq one of their loved ones may consider becoming an insugent. So trust me...I feel alot safer now.
2006-11-08 02:38:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by brsug15 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
I'm sure Bush will be glad to hand-deliver the invites himself. After all, if we're attacked by Jordan, it could be his big chance to get back by invading Portugal. Plus the only time Bush's numbers have gone up is when we're attacked. Every other time he's been on a downhill slope.
Actually, the best thing Dems could do for the terrorists is give them a map showing there Texas is. The terrorists were a bit ignorant about where the bad guys live. They're not in the North-East.
2006-11-08 02:31:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Good Times, Happy Times... 4
·
2⤊
4⤋
Yes , We are dead. Might as well tell No. Korea and Russia too.
At least they will nuke us so it will be quick.Wow just read answers . Shocked !!!! We are dead now.The Demo Brats will be running and hiding in holes.I am to sick to read or write.The
invitations are out.All other Nations are breaking out the champagne,Wow no more courage or strength here.
2006-11-08 02:46:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by gwhiz1052 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
No need. The elections results are invitation enough.
2006-11-08 02:45:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
What are you talking about it was your stupid *** Nazi hillbilly president that let the terrorist bomb the WTC,and didn't even get Osama!!!Are all people from Texas stupid or just you & Bush.Surely you must be from there to say something so stupid.
2006-11-08 02:43:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by bradship4u 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
oh, please. rebuplicans are so set in their ways.
there ARE democrats that aren't going to "send hand written or engraved invitations to terrorists". just cause someone's democrat doesnt mean they support terrorists or the war in iraq
2006-11-08 02:32:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by Cayleen O 3
·
1⤊
4⤋
you are mocking the verdict of intelligent and peace loving people of the USA who voted for dems.for your information it was bush who joined with Pakistan president Musharraf who sponsored state terrorism against India .i hope the win of dems may make bush think for a while whether his brutal attack on Iraq is a blunder.
2006-11-08 02:31:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
i read some of the questions and answers and have to shake my head I know it is not possible any one believes the nonsense I'm reading This question is so stupid it really isn't worth answering.
2006-11-08 02:50:37
·
answer #11
·
answered by Lolo 3
·
1⤊
2⤋