Is bush the greatest president ever or the worst president ever?

Question

Clearly there are those of you who are passionately in favor of both sides of this question. I'd like to hear you response, as I already know mine.

Answer 1

By far the worst. The only reason we are not rioting is because this country is so complacent and docile. If this were the 60's generation, or the war generation, Bush would have been impeached long ago.

Answer 2

Very probably, the worst president ever. In the next 2 years, and possibly longer we will begin to see what his leadership, or lack thereof, has cost the United States.
The greatest president would be gracious, eloquent, and show his high class, by working with what the PEOPLE have given him.
The worst president would weild his veto pen relentlessly like a spoiled child that doesn't get his way. He would ignore the PEOPLE'S voice, and continue in the wrong direction on the many serious issues facing this nation today.

Answer 3

I have to say he's THE WORST president ever, so let me break it down like this:
1. Getting us into an illegal conflict in Iraq with just a little white lie. Now that has caused an extremely high surge in heightened threat of terror attacks here at home and around the world. In adddition, his lying for a case to go into an unwinnable war has killed thousands of American soldiers, Iraqi cops and security forces, and thousands of innocent civilians,
2. Eavesdropping on ordinary Americans for the good of stopping terrorism,
3. Stripping us of our Constitutional rights in the wake of the 9/11 attacks,
4. Allowing all the good-paying manufacturing jobs go overseas for MUCH cheaper labor (In other words, he's just sitting around while job losses were multiplying rapidly);
5. Multiplied the deficit; and
6. Threatened to go to war against Iran over the nuclear issue. Diplomacy should be the only way to defuse this standoff, not war! The war option, that's if the incompetent Bush so chooses to use it, would further destabilize the politically-tense Middle East and bring that corner of the world into a violent war.
That's how I would like to sum it all up in six ways.

Answer 4

all and sundry of your factors has a sparkling constructive be conscious to it. Or on the selection least, has exchange little sinse the Reagan administration. C'mon, interest loss ? Lowest and maximum non-quit unemployment trend (at the instant 4.7%) because of the fact 1982 the place it approached 10%. not often substantial. you have fallen into the thick media fog. don't be a trifling sheep, persist with alongside blindly, and make a contribution to the misrepresentation. you have a private duty to look at this your self and sparkling away the mist and shed mild on the relatively certainty of issues. in case you think of the media isn't biased against each thing Bush, your fallacious.

Answer 5

He's certainly closer to worse than best. Tough to know if he'd be the worst, as Ulysses S. Grant, Herbert Hoover, and Jimmy Carter all would make decent arguments for worst ever.

With no real domestic policy accomplishments (Social Security stalled out, rehauled Medicare has been confusing at best, the economy has gone sideways, etc.), his entire Presidency is hung on Iraq which looks like a suspect decision in retrospect. The major reason for eliminating the Baathists in Baghdad was to prevent a threat from becoming a realized attack. The secondary benefit of a petri dish for Middle Eastern democracy would have the power to make the decision look good in revisionist history. However, without Iraq becoming the democratic, peaceful nation of the Middle East that he argued for, history would be forced to reject the Bush Doctrine of Pre-emption.

Neutral to Negative on domestic policy, and mildly to majorly Negative on foreign policy would have to put him in the bottom 10 no question, the bottom 5 most likely, and a strong argument can be made for the worst ever. It's not partisan, unfortunately he just hasn't measured up even by his own methods of evaluation.

Answer 6

Definitely the stupidest flunky ever set foot in that office! What a monkey for $$$$ capitalist CEOs and a personal and professional affront to 50+ years of work by other prez to build international relations.

Answer 7

No the best, but definitely not the worst. Harding was the worst President ever.

Answer 8

neither, he is just a fallible human being trying to do a thankless job with little or no support...every president who has ever served has been dealt the same hand. personally i would not take that position if it were offered. ppl attacking you on all sides, nothing you do ever appeases anyone and all for a salary that many mid level exec's make.

Answer 9

He most definitely gets a nomination in the worst category!

Answer 10

I believe him to be the worst, most corrupt president we have ever had.