English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-11-07 18:01:36 · 16 answers · asked by Poker P 1 in Sports Football (American)

16 answers

Recievers at present are wild, each and every severe profile reciever is interior the information for battling with their group or no longer exhibiting as much as camps or something of the type. final 3 hundred and sixty 5 days Randy Moss post the main eminent numbers ever by potential of a reciever. and ultimately, the Rams had between the worst archives interior the league and are not as severe profile by using fact the patriots or cowboys. Torry Holt is between the proper energetic extensive outs and merely by using fact he's a competent guy and doesnt broadcast his problems to the international he's no longer getting the credit he merits.

2016-12-28 15:46:38 · answer #1 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

no, top 5 probably.

There's a large field of talent in the NFL when it comes to recievers. Steve Smith is probably the best reciever in the NFL. The man's incredible. Holt just gets the ball alot because Bulger's not scared to throw it up there. On another team I seriously think his production would suffer. That said, he's not on another team, so I'll put him in the top 5. Harrison, Smith, Johnson, Coles, and maybe Santana Moss.

2006-11-07 18:27:33 · answer #2 · answered by jimmytownnative 2 · 0 0

yes

1)Randy and TO are either not in groove w/their QBs (tho it seems TO is getting there) /that have lost a step (believeable for TO, but randy should be only a tad past his prime --time wise-- if that)

2) Marvin is still good but not in his prime
3)Chad and Steve have not been as good as Tory, as long as Tory --just look at his stats on NFL network, that man produces regardless of the situation (only his rookie season has he gotten less than 1300yds, and then he only had 52 receptions)

and because I want to get it across, Chad>Steve --he's proven to be more consistant, untill Smith keeps playing like he did last year for a while, then he might be better than Chad

oh, and using guys atop the current recieving yards leaders list is pointless, those lists usually change all the time. Andre Johnson is decent, but by no means one of the best recievers in the league --same goes for Coles.

2006-11-08 01:50:51 · answer #3 · answered by Andy T 4 · 0 0

I think he is a top 5 reciever. Remember reciever benefits from two things 1 a good quarterback 2 a system that fits their talents....he has both, but I still think he is an outstanding player and one of the most underated players in the NFL. He does not get enough recognition.He is better then the likes of Chad Johnson of the Bengal but Chad gets tons of recognition...totally unfair.

2006-11-08 01:49:24 · answer #4 · answered by cyborg_2099 3 · 0 0

Depends on what you mean by "best". Most yards? Most catches? Most Yards after catch? Team leader? etc

Lots of great WRs in the league. Think Tory Holt is overlooked by many. He is definately in top 5, some will argue he is the best

2006-11-07 23:44:10 · answer #5 · answered by mikea_va 6 · 0 0

I dont think so man - Andre Johnson (HOU) has 752yds and 4 TDs this season and Marques Colston (NO) has 700yds and 7 TDs this season - TORRY HOLT has 624yds and 7 TDs

2006-11-07 18:06:34 · answer #6 · answered by DDallasJr 2 · 0 1

I think he is but there are other good receivers that have the talent like him like Dieon Branch, Chad Jonson and andre jonson but i think hes the best

2006-11-08 00:11:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Definitely yes.

2006-11-07 18:02:58 · answer #8 · answered by Vas 3 · 1 0

no way, there are pplenty better than him, he is in the top 5 but not #1

2006-11-08 03:16:29 · answer #9 · answered by rcaines1 3 · 0 0

no he isn't. he's not quite as good as harrison, chad johnson, smith, and andre johnson. he's probably the best after these guys, but definitely NOT the best

2006-11-07 18:10:14 · answer #10 · answered by C_Millionaire 5 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers