2006-11-07 17:54:47 · 22 answers · asked by Chuck Dhue 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Yes.
2006-11-07 17:56:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
No, everyone talks about Palosi but I gaurantee that the rest of the dems are going to pull her off to the side and tell her to cool it. Her opinions are in the minority even in the democratic party and if she runs wild the dems will be long gone come '08. In fact it isn't even sure she will be spaker, she has to be voted in and some in the party have already taken aim at what they concider a hinderence.
America will pull together and move forward. We have every time there has been a change.
2006-11-07 18:02:30 · answer #2 · answered by JFra472449 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To a prior commentator: it is probably no longer a black-and-white difficulty for some people, yet while nooses have been hung in places to remark on Obama's candidacy, some anybody is surely seeing it this form. I want it did no longer ought to be approximately race, yet to be very honest, i do no longer see race being beside the point right here. yet to respond to the question: i think of there is a few undesirable incidents. yet i think of there can be some inspiring moments of braveness and team spirit. I merely extremely wish the latter would be fundamental.
2016-12-14 03:29:31 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on your point of view. As one who wants as little government as possible, the next 2 years should see significant gridlock, as the Socialists will view the vote as some mandate to try and ram their class-warfare agenda down our throats, and Bush will inevitably end up using the veto pen.
Two years with essentially no government will be glorious.
2006-11-07 18:05:37 · answer #4 · answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
NO, it could be a new beginning, but its all in the hands of the dem's now and the nation will be waiting to see just what they propose to do about the problems we are facing. one great thing about today no matter what party you are for is the turn out seemed to be bigger and better than expected and when you get ppl to vote then its a good day.
2006-11-07 17:57:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No I don't. We need change. The republicans say, th Dems don't have a plan. But, neither does Bush! Bush does not hae a play to get out of Iraq. My only worry is I don't like Nancy Pelosi, she's evil. I wish some other Dem was SoftheH.
2006-11-07 18:36:24 · answer #6 · answered by Pastor Mary 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Absolutely. They are a day of Democrat spite, not victory. They have not voted for Democrats, but voted against Bush, and that is a very sad day for America.
I can only hope the Dem house will work with the Rep Exec. and Judiciary to further promote American growth and progress instead of going against it head on.
2006-11-07 17:57:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Heck no! It's a day for celebration that I've been working the last two years for with MoveOn.org. Just hope the Democrats take the Senate, as well as the House. Maybe we'll have a more balanced government now that the Republicans have to share with the Democrats.
2006-11-07 18:13:55 · answer #8 · answered by KIT J 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
it is a sad day for america, when uneducated people blame democrats for too much spending.
FACT - Bush has spent 166 billion dollars on Iraq and war in afghanistan ($166,000,000,000).
FACT - when BUSH took office, the US budget had the largest surplus in US history.
FACT - five years later, the US economy has the largest deficit in US history.
Surely, Democrats can't spend more money than this GOP.
2006-11-07 18:15:59 · answer #9 · answered by BikeDude75 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Doesn't really matter that the Democrats have won the House. It means that there will be major gridlock in Washington. That could be a good thing. The politicians can't screw things up more.
2006-11-07 17:59:07 · answer #10 · answered by haterade 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. The anarchy of the WW II era may have met its match for a while.
2006-11-07 21:00:05 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋