2006-11-07 15:26:22 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I would say so...quack quack!!
2006-11-07 15:31:32 · answer #1 · answered by Gettin_by 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
The answer to whether or not Bush will become a lame duck President or not will depend entirely upon President Bush. And we will begin to see that answer tomorrow morning.
The President can either choose to accept the mandate from the people that was voiced in this election (and that he ignored until now). The next two years can be more productive than the previous six years if will take a humble approach tomorrow morning, accept the fact that he has become disconnected from the American people, and choose to accept the hand of cooperation that Ms. Pelosi appears ready to extend.
President Bush will only become a lame duck President if he chooses that path.
2006-11-07 18:06:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It could be forced to the center pollitically and Iraq war policy the democrats will put the pressure cooker on Duyda here. Otherwise, its the same old pork barrell game and most incumbants in both parties got elected the new comers will be given scrap pork bits. Bush will end up better because of the election because it will forced him to look more towards the middle a little bit more and have to look beyond the 20% base in the republican party.
2006-11-07 15:37:19 · answer #3 · answered by ram456456 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He became a lame duck the day his second term started since he's unable to run for office again.
2006-11-07 15:39:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He's already lame. As far as a lame duck is concerned, I think we still need to see if the Dems are going to win the senate.
2006-11-07 15:28:26 · answer #5 · answered by TrainerMan 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
He is really a lame duck after today! He better start making some exit plans from Iraq because money is going to dry up!
2006-11-07 15:29:14 · answer #6 · answered by cantcu 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
He's got two more years of hobbling along. Hopefully, the House can keep him in line. But the President has enormous power and this dolt (Bush, of course) wields it like a spoiled child in a toy store.
2006-11-07 15:38:01 · answer #7 · answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He is already lame. As for the duck part, don't insult such a lovely bird like that ;)
2006-11-07 15:32:03 · answer #8 · answered by Demon Doll 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Not at all just because a liberal Senate or house takes power Bush still has his veto power to keep them in check and the Dems still don't have to real power with three quarters that when anyone should worry because they can amend the Constitution.
2006-11-07 15:30:42 · answer #9 · answered by izzual 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
What is lame is the majority of Democrats & Moderates didn't vote for the issue, they voted against George Bush! I don't know what my guy is for but I am against Bush! What is even lamer they admit it.
2006-11-07 15:29:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
i've considered him a lame duck since 2000
2006-11-07 15:30:40 · answer #11 · answered by blonde101 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋