English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-11-07 14:14:55 · 2 answers · asked by Rafael 2 in Arts & Humanities History

2 answers

He was ambivalent. He thought the issue should be decided locally, but he was staunchly for the Union. After his defeat by Lincoln he undertook a mission for the President to rally support for the Union in the South. Many attirbute his untimely death by typhoid in 1861 to these efforts.

2006-11-07 14:58:34 · answer #1 · answered by Jim P 4 · 0 0

Basically pro, with qualifications. He wanted slavery to be decided by local populations, so that it would not be a national issue--however, because he wrote the Kansas-Nebraska Act; he was associated with the Fugitive Slave Act.

2006-11-07 22:55:46 · answer #2 · answered by angel_deverell 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers