Isn't Coach for poor people who want to look high end?
2006-11-07 14:11:23 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Beauty & Style ➔ Fashion & Accessories
I totally disagree. Louis Vuitton bags are one of the most copied. If you think about it, "poor" people are more likely to use Louis bags, because you can easily and cheaply get a fake one.
2006-11-07 14:23:21 · answer #1 · answered by Silvia C 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Coach bags are not overrated. And they are not for poor people. A purse is just that, a purse! It is a "bag" to carry your personal items in. I have both a Coach & LV...the price doesn't bother me either way. At the ame time I have purses by Guess, BabyPhat, Dooney & Bourke, Guuci, Prada, etc. (I'm a purse aholic). But I never let the price or name make my decision. If I like, I buy it. I could care less if someone at Wal-mart has the same bag as me or if some star has my bag.
#2, what is your definition of poor? Cause I know of NO poor people who even have a Guess bag much less a Coach bag. However, I do know PLENTY of people who could easily afford a Coach bag & prefer not to spend that much on a purse.
To each his own.
2006-11-07 22:32:27 · answer #2 · answered by georgiadiva 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't think Coach is for poor people. Coach bags are really expensive. I think most of them are really really cute. But Louis is also really good. I dont know. I like them both. I think both are for people that have money. =]
2006-11-07 22:13:39 · answer #3 · answered by Chelc 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Coach is more affordable for middleclass people because if you are poor you would be wearing knock-offs and you wouldnt be worried about paying over $100 dollars for a d*mn purse while LV is intended for the higher class but it is also one of the most bootlegged designer
2006-11-07 22:39:15 · answer #4 · answered by ~Kiki~ 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Uhh, actually Coach has been a respectable leatherwear brand for quite some time. It has only been recently that they've become a household name along with "Louis".
2006-11-07 22:14:12 · answer #5 · answered by kaye t 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
lol most poor people would b lucky to have a paper bag.coach is ok i agree but it is kinda expensive.i dunno.it depends on what kinda money u have.but louis is good too.i like em both but i dont think coach is overreated.=]
2006-11-07 22:29:58 · answer #6 · answered by LiL_TaYTaY♥ 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I've always thought that coach is for poor people too, but some of it is actually worth buying.
Just not the stuff everyone else can afford.
I hate having the same stuff as someone else.
Yeah, you definitely don't put Gucci & Dooney & Bourke together in the same category.
2006-11-07 22:20:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
I think that Louis Vuitton is for people who want to seem high end. Mostly everyone's Louis is fake, anyways.
2006-11-08 17:24:30 · answer #8 · answered by miss inimitable 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think LV is overrated too, the fact that it does not hold any sales make pple think that it is really high class/end but look at all d imitations out there....
2006-11-07 22:58:52 · answer #9 · answered by SK 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Poor people? You are a total snob! I have both kinds of bags and I am NOT poor!
2006-11-07 23:04:28 · answer #10 · answered by Erika 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋