English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Mine was Iraq.

2006-11-07 10:40:29 · 10 answers · asked by FootballFan1012 6 in Politics & Government Elections

10 answers

The general incompetence, cronyism and downright dishonesty of the republicans. I voted for change! We need to have people who know what they are doing running agencies like FEMA, not big GOP money people.

2006-11-07 10:46:39 · answer #1 · answered by Maple 7 · 3 1

Number 1: Iraq. A tragic waste of life, money, and the reputation of our military ... where the main result will be a *strengthening* of our enemies by swelling their ranks, and providing an ugly illustration of what American occupation looks like to all nations of the middle east.

Number 2: Deficit ... the continued borrowing of money for bogus "tax cuts" for my generation, at the expense of my kid's generation, who have to pay that debt back with *their* taxes.

2006-11-07 10:53:31 · answer #2 · answered by c_sense_101 2 · 0 0

Iraq.

2006-11-07 10:46:38 · answer #3 · answered by gnatlord 4 · 3 0

To insure that an accurate vote count occurs. Did you check to see that your vote was recorded and can be checked on later? Put pressure on your Board of Elections to get rid of the phony voting machines. They are rigged to go with the owner's favorites-- Republicans.

2006-11-07 10:43:47 · answer #4 · answered by Reba K 6 · 2 0

it is not any longer in elementary terms "Evangelical Christians" who're in comparison; it is Catholics, too, which make up over one billion people interior the international. the situation has gained "steam" this previous decade by way of fact the further and extra medical examine it extremely is carried out concerning abortion and existence interior the womb from the very earliest stages, it turns into obvious and obtrusive that it is unquestionably taking the existence of a new child. And the extra medical examine comes out, the weaker the professional-determination facet's arguments grow to be. Ultrasounds, genetics (as all of us be attentive to it as we talk), and fertility examine have been surely non-existent 35 years in the past, or the technological information replaced into bogus. maximum criminal pupils as we talk, even the professional-determination ones, understand that the criminal opinion written via the courtroom is heavily incorrect and poorly built. From a criminal attitude, Roe V. wade can under no circumstances be overturned by way of guy precise to privateness difficulty it desperate. For abortion to be made unlawful, a sparkling criminal precedent ought to be argued. it extremely is far less complicated suggested than carried out. We now be attentive to that abortion is homicide. There are approximately 4 million harmless unborn babies murdered each 12 months. So, to anybody with a set of morals who is conscious the situation, it is a extensive deal to proceed scuffling with it. it is an identical theory while the U. S. initially pronounced that slaves have been 3/5 of someone (or despite the fact that it replaced into). could you have argued then that it is not any longer your organization and additionally you in elementary terms are worried approximately paying the hire? i do no longer recommend to decrease your situations...it is a tough international accessible, extremely now. a woman's "determination" shouldn't come previous to the existence of her new child. If she's no longer able or unwilling to preserve it, there are alternatives besides killing it. And, frankly, she ought to have theory approximately that till now enjoying a romp interior the sack. it is not any longer forcing her to hold the baby. She made that determination. She is prevalent with complete properly that in case you have intercourse, you ought to possibly get pregnant. No new child ought to pay the merely precise value merely by way of fact he has irresponsible mum and dad.

2016-12-14 03:18:17 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

my biggest issue was the unbalance of power in our government.this administration has taught us one thing .giving one side all the power just doesn't work.in fact it is a disgrace.so i voted to balance the power.

2006-11-07 12:53:49 · answer #6 · answered by crazywildman1 3 · 0 0

I already ask a question on it, but I had difficulty telling wchih line was Davies and wchih was Chris. I had a poll worker tell me , as they were both so close to both names it was hard to tell wchih belong to whom!

2006-11-07 10:50:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I was mostly trying to do my part in helping the Republicans stay in power in Congress.

While the republicans are far from perfect, it really will be dangerous for America if the liberal anti-war party gains control.

2006-11-07 10:45:09 · answer #8 · answered by MackDaddy10 1 · 0 3

I didn't have an issue. Nothing to complain about!

2006-11-07 10:42:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Illegal immigration.

2006-11-07 10:44:59 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers