Did President Bush go to war with Iraq with a plan for winning the Peace?

Question

Did our President rush into this war?
Will we really ever be able to say "Mission Accomplished" or is this war going to be never ending?

If so, what can be done about it now?
And what could have been done differently at the begginning?

Answer 1

It is apparent to the whole world by now that president Bush had no plans beyond marching into Baghdad to be greeted by masses of flower throwing people.
Now that Bush has broken it; he does not know how to fix it. Those paying the price are 100,000s of Iraqi dead and a destroyed country in chaos.
Iraq right now looks beyond repair. I certainly know of no cogent plans to right things from any source. Iraq will remain a black stain on the US for years to come.

Answer 2

George Walker Bush is blatently dishonest.
He rolled his brand new military machine into Bagdad basically moments after promising that he would not use our countrys' military for "nation building". His primary goal from the very beginning was to remove Saddam from power and install a democratic government. We were to be "greeted as liberators".
Ask him what the war in Iraq had to do with 9-11 - he'll tell you: Nothing.
He had a brand new toy and wanted to play with it. He watched his daddy get very popular when he busted up Iraq a decade earlier. He wanted to make a mark in the history books, too.

Answer 3

Well I'm just thinking lots of people are dying by his hands . A lot of people in Iraq lost their family and have no where to stay. Bush waste a lot of money each year for wars. The money we pay for tax!!! If we didn't have wars then we could have spend a lot of the other money to do scientific research and by now if we didn't have war HIV AND cancer will no longer be a deadly disease!!!!!

Answer 4

i trust that he did certainly rush into this warfare. He purely needed to end what his Daddy began. i imagine that we favor to pull out and enable the Iraqi people get the mission carried out. i imagine that there replaced into no plan for "after" consequences. All because we were given Sadaam potential not something now. All we needed to do replaced into take care of the oil fields over there with very minimum protection for the Iraqi people. that is a shame. continually being grasping. Bush is a follower not a pacesetter. we could continually of lengthy gone in, were given Sadaam and were given out. era.

Answer 5

LET US NEVER FORGET THAT iRAQ HAD ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH 9-11. George W. just wanted to finish up what cheney and Rumsfeld thought little George's daddy should have done when we went into Kuwait......big George made wise decision....his son has never listened to him and learned anything.

Answer 6

war comes before peace. i'm sorry, but that's the way the story goes.
look into any disaster (communism, dictatorship, genicide....) and war has been what ended it. sometimes, bloodshed is neccessary. i'm sorry, but that is the way it goes. no one likes it, and everyone knows it's horrible. bush isn't a 'war monger', he is realistic: he knows that if you don't work and make sacrifices, nothing good will happen.
instead of dropping the support that the troops need, why not recognize what they're going through? it makes me sick seeing these people abandoning the troops. they are over there FOR US. please don't forget it.

Answer 7

you'v got to be kiidding, oil os the only reason, I would give you a stronger opinion but then yahoo remove my answer

Answer 8

remember what bush said:
" we had 2 invade! they were building wepeons of mass destrution!"
suuure they were!*(sarcasticly)* hahahaha! i dont like bush.

Answer 9

We had 911 don't forget it.