A lot of the crime is not racist as such in South Africa but is committed by people who were taken as children into terrorist training camps, given the minimum of education but taught how to lay land mines, throw grenades and fire AK49's. Now they are unemployable, homeless and starving and, not having had the normal socialisation that living at home with parents provides, do not know that it is not OK to rob, rape and kill. Thousands of policemen are killed in South Africa every year and it will take at least a generation to normalise things
I am not condoning the crime in South Africa as I was a victim and left that country after 40 years in Africa to come home to the UK (where I was born, educated and married) for my health and safety but I can understand the problems that beautiful country is grappling with- The crime wave is NOT state sponsored. The ANC government knows how much it needs western finance to put the country to rights after the apartheid era and is doing what it can to improve education and to find work for the unemployed, to encourage the economy and there are articles about this in the serious British newspapers such as The Guardian, The Times, etc. every week. It is only the populist papers such as The Sun, Daily Mirror, News of the World etc. that do not publish these kinds of stories because they know that in the main, the general public are not interested in what is happening thousands of miles away unless it involves British troops.
2006-11-07 09:35:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by blondie 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
you're talking as if the crimes are only commited by black people toward white people. Even proportionally speaking (seeing as white South Africans are a minority), black on white crime is NOTHING compared to black on black crime in South Africa and I'm talking about rape, murder, burglary, police torture, gang rivalry, and all that. South Africa's crime rate is one thing, but pretending that it is a racial thing and comparing black on white crime to a genocide...that's crazy. If any group of people can claim to be persecuted in South Africa, it is the Albinos because of the miracle cure superstition and other African immigrants, especially Zimbabweans, Malawians, Mozambicans and Congolese immigrants because now that's real "hate crime".
2016-05-22 08:30:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Firstly you need to ignore that answer from Malan who works in the Tourist Industry in SA and is linked to the gay Pieter Boshof and his discredited site the real South Africa. They will say anything to safeguard their income and have no morality whatsoever in inviting Tourists to the toilet that used to be South Africa. Shortly his real identity will be revealed. There is no such thing as a racist crime in SA when it is Black on White and they use the tired old apartheid excuse to justify the barbarism. Crime is undoubtedly sponsored when you appreciate that 75% of ANC politicians have a recent criminal record for fraud. However, it is more serious and there is every reason to believe that their Commissioner of Police is in cahoots with the Crime Syndicates in SA. Hence his nickname " the Godfather". There are also numerous case of Police being directly involved in armed robbery and extortion etc as well as selling their guns and uniforms to criminals. The murder rate is totally under stated by the ANC and is not in accord with the statistics of Health Professionals who put it at as 50% more or Interpol who put at 4 times higher.We will never know the truth as like the Tourist Board they are covering up anything to do with crime. You only mention murder but what about the rape and particularly baby rape where those savages believe this to be a cure for AIDS. Also not mentioned is the torture that murder victims have to endure from these animals and many wives and children will have pictures for evermore of their Husband and/or Father being tortured of Mothers being gang raped. The Media is totally manipulated by the ANC through the granting of broadcasting licences or BEE ( stealing White businesses) and the onlt valid source of information is the crime sites which are exposing the truth and the morally bankrupt Tourist Industry. The only question is how much longer before SA has the War it never had by opting for a negotiated settlement. Apartheid was a crime against humanity but what is happening now is no more than a low key war directed at Whites. Millions have fled the toilet but many cannot for various reasons. The Afrikaaner in particular and his culture is being targetted and the ANC totally under estimate the will of that Nation at their peril. As for the British newspapers and ther reporting there are equally as many reports expressing grave concern about the crime wave in South Africa inthe broadsheets. William Rees Moggs wrote a very interesting article in the London Times last month regarding the Land grabs initiated by the ANC which was supported in numerous postings. Not every British person is fooled by the ANC and its Mandela /Rainbow Nation but there is worse to come. Hopefully FIFA abandon 2010 for that will be the biggest slaughter ever to happen.
One of the crime sites is currently formulating charges of Genocide against the ANC which will be shortly routed to the United Nations. Lets see if in this day of political correctness if they have the balls to take a stand against an uncaring and self enriching collection of former terrorists.
2006-11-09 01:19:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by Alf Garnett 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
Huh? In 2001 456 whites were murdered at a rate of 10.3 per 100 000. In 1991 the rate was 4.3 per 100 000 while 91% of that killings were committed by whites. The USA has a murder rate of 5 per 100 000 per year.
Ok, that's the stats. The murders of whites are low compared to the African people, but murder of white farmers are extremely high. That link with picture the asker gave, is white farmers who was killed - the white farm population is less than 1% of the white population. I don't want to accuse the asker of racism, but that website is a right-wing, ultra-racist website, so please don't go there.
South Africa's whites are still much better of than the other races. More than 95% of commercial farm land is in the hand of whites, more than 99% of white farms, more than 60% of home loans and we also have 200 000 super-rich individuals of which 50% are white. White unemployment is below USA's unemployment rate and stand at 4.8%. The white population = 9%.
The asker's comment "The is state sponsored genocide in the making and might turn into an almighty holocaust as its the one unifying thing all the 11 black tribes agree on hatred of the whites." is all lies. Off course there will be some racist attacks, but to make as if its the norm is a lie.
And why does black on white crime gets little coverage? It does! Black on black crime nearly gets any coverage. However, why MUST black on white crime gets coverage if we all are people and equal before God? Why do you judge people on the color of their skin?
2006-11-07 22:40:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Malan 3
·
3⤊
3⤋
Why do you think there has been such a flood of rich whites leaving that the government passed a law restricting how much money a person can send out of the country.
South Africa is becoming Zimbabwe part 2
2006-11-07 09:11:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Have gun, will travel. 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
When SA became a democracy it was a victory for blacks. BUT just because whites abused them doesn't mean that now they should "rule" the country. They should admit that because of their inexperience they should still let a white man be president. Unfortunately if a white man becomes president now the people will be in outrage. Look at Hillen Zille. PS I read in Die Burger that some famous fortune teller said that SA is going to get a white president again.
2006-11-08 01:27:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Hugo 1
·
1⤊
2⤋
Quite agree. All racism is wrong - look at what is going on in Zimbabwe with Mugabe for goodness' sake. No media coverage because of political correctness gone mad.
2006-11-07 09:11:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Miss Behavin 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
Political Correctness will be the cause of the downfall of civilization as we now know it. Rhodesia was condemned because whites, a minority, ruled over the black majority. The whites are forced out and instead of a prosperous Rhodesia, we now have Zimbabwe. S.A., ditto, from prosperity to garbage. Where are those 'do-gooders' now when their so-called good intentions have failed so miserably?
2006-11-07 13:12:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mr.Wise 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
Yes that is so true.it happens all over the world nowadays.black on white crime just doesn't justify a headline on the front page of a newspaper.if it was the other way around it would make a big headline,and i think that the whole world is suddenly treating blacks like they are royalty of some description.the truth of the matter is that if it wasn't for the Europeans these savages would still have run around in there tribal clothing and speared each other to death.what the western people dont understand is how savage these bastards act.i am a south African citizen and blacks in Africa will remain backward and savages forever.now call me a racist for telling the truth.
2006-11-07 09:24:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by kobie65 3
·
4⤊
5⤋
It is racist to look for colour when a drugged up underprivileged person mugs a well dressed wealthy person and takes his i pod. Colour does not come into it at all. Even if its in Brixton or SA. Lets cut the bull. If I wanted a few rand for crack, I will be unchoosy about who I hit.
2006-11-07 15:21:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋