2006-11-07 08:42:10 · 19 answers · asked by whiteas_gooddeeds 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Hey Whiteas,
We would all say Ya hoo, I mean you.
2006-11-07 08:48:31 · answer #1 · answered by BuyTheSeaProperty 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
In ancient societies usage of a persons name was said to give the user power.
yet they succeed and evidence of their existence is so not using a name worked out fine if we had no names at all I am sure that things would still be ok
2006-11-07 16:49:03 · answer #2 · answered by Cherry Berry 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A nameless society. Not possible. Even if you had to refer to someone as, "The chick with the blond hair". That's similar to what the Native American did. "Runs with a fist". That's still their name. You can't have a nameless society even if speech didn't exist. Even sign language would be giving someone a name. You just couldn't hear it. A nameless society would be a society without name givers.
.
2006-11-07 16:57:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If we didn't have names, we would probably come up with a new system of identification, like numbers, or remembering what each person's faces look like... But we do have names, so that's a bit of a trivial question.
2006-11-07 16:55:00 · answer #4 · answered by nanceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!! 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
use what prince used some kind of weird mark the shape is the same as the blemish photo in the michael jackson trial
2006-11-07 19:36:10 · answer #5 · answered by great white fisherman 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would be great. There are too many labels and all they do is give the illusion of separation, when truly we are all one. No names would cause people to look at each other more.
2006-11-07 17:16:46 · answer #6 · answered by ontheroadagainwithoutyou 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think we would be given nicknames maybe. That's a interesting question, If we were just here. Then maybe we would be address by a characteristic or culture.
2006-11-07 16:53:29 · answer #7 · answered by professionllifestyle 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
we call eachother by number. Adam is 1, Eve is 2 and so on...
2006-11-07 16:49:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
This sounds like a Chicken little question to me.
2006-11-08 04:07:11 · answer #9 · answered by clcalifornia 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
all would be called "HEY"
but i guess again we might of call our "hey"s in different voice tonal that would be distinguishable from person to person or group to group (for example i wouldn't call ladies in a harsh "hey", and after a while in a group of people, guys wouldn't response to my smooth "hey"s, thinking that it is for one of ladies).
2006-11-08 04:03:14 · answer #10 · answered by Maziar 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would be difficult to communitcate. We name everything including each other.
2006-11-07 16:50:59 · answer #11 · answered by retorik75 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋