I'm not sure I understand the question....
too hazy, ask again later.
2006-11-07 09:50:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Zippy 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
Ambiguously vague.
2006-11-07 07:34:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mental Floss 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, I prefer to be ambiguously vague.
2006-11-07 07:32:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
To be either is to be giving up being either so I am afraid I cannot answer your question without being vague or ambiguous.
2006-11-07 07:34:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I prefer to be vague and ambiguous than to be straight-forward and simple and common and cliche.
2006-11-07 09:26:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by toxicPoison 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well, my answer to your query would, of course, taking into account your phrasing, and understanding the nature of answering, that would be the reply.
(Which was that? Vague or ambiguous? You tell me.)
2006-11-07 07:34:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Lady Ettejin of Wern 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well they are almost the same thing if you are ambiguous you are vague unintentially but if you are equivocal you are vague intentionally... so I would prefer to be equivocal (I know it wasn't an option but it should've been)
2006-11-07 07:54:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by LilLiE 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
I like to say things that can be taken two ways, so I guess that makes me ambiguous.
2006-11-07 07:34:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I'm leaning towards ambiguous.
2006-11-07 07:47:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by Silly Rabbit 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
I'm more on the ambiguous side.
2006-11-07 07:40:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by ▒Яenée▒ 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I prefer to be ambidextrous. That way the right hand never knows what the left is doing, and if it's shady I always have plausible deniability.
2006-11-07 21:37:33
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋