I think they would compliment each other well. Experience plus charisma. I don't think that any of the potential Republican teams can beat that.
2006-11-07 07:59:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by tamesbadger 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
they have easily been floating this balloon obtainable for a mutually as. seem, the Democrat party has painted itself right into a corner. Hillary replaced right into a shoe in, then Obama got here alongside and drew away lots of her help. Then he grew to become out to be incorrect. the difficulty is he has already grew to become those human beings faraway from Hillary. One a former supporter easily starts off to seem at Hillary, warts and all they do unlike what they see. Now they're repulsed via Obama and have no residing house. Desperation time. 2 applicants interior the working for the nomination that the party is familiar with will no longer be able to win the election. they % a answer which will reunify the party, mutually as nonetheless having a shot at winning the election. to that end the Gore thought. it ought to artwork. *
2016-10-21 10:41:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by goodknight 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Al Gore is old news. Forget him.
B. Obama is brilliant and charismatic. So what. He's also one of those politicians who NEVER had a real job. They go from high school to college to get a law degree, then run for public office. When they win, they get to live off the taxpayer's money for a few decades, then guess what? They end up being multimillionaires. And after NEVER having a real job in their lives.
Congress is full of these types. The majority of our congressmen/women are:
1) Lawyers
2) Multimillionaires
3) Charismatic and brilliant
It's time to vote for someone who has actually worked for a living--not counting their voluntary "public service" baloney--and does not belong to the Republican or Democratic party. Obama doesn't fit this description.
2006-11-07 07:48:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by JEREMY 2
·
4⤊
2⤋
Bring on the Barack. By the fact he is the new kid on the block, he will bring the new kid enthusiasm to the job. He can tell a joke without botching the punchline, and he is well spoken enough to be respected by the world.
Oprah--she is a goddess, and if she ever ran, I would vote for her. She actually built homes for people after Katrina hit, that is better than our government actually managed to get accomplished.
Gore is damaged goods. He even give damaged goods a bad name. He backed down in 2000 and I will never vote for him again.
Hillary has way too much baggage, and she divides people. I wouldn't vote for her unless it was a last resort.
2006-11-07 07:58:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Lucky Lola 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
i think Barak Obama will start to move masses just like malcom x or marthin luther king did in the past. He could be america´s next black leader but not president, not in a country were racism still exists, and were the fact that he wins or looses the elections does not only depends on how many votes he accomplishes but of the political and personal interests of the ones that are really behind the goverment.
too bad these things happen, in the God-blessed country.
2006-11-07 07:42:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by whothatBE 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Obama would make an excellent vice president under anyone but Gore. I voted against him (and Bush) in 2000 and will do it again if he runs.
2006-11-07 07:33:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by john_stolworthy 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Al Gore's time has gone. He could be a good help in any election these days, but I think he's no longer electable.
Obama is fantastic. I hope he runs and the American people get to truly understand the kind of leader he is. I know he's a senator, he's inexperienced in national politics, and (oh dear) he's black. But he can inspire and mobalize people better than Clinton -- probably right up there with Kennedy.
2006-11-07 07:25:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Perdendosi 7
·
5⤊
2⤋
Gore needs to stay out of it, he will only frustrate and annoy people. He should have a sequal out by then and should be busy anyway. Obaman, maybe, we still have to wait and see. His record is minimal and we aren't yet sure what he's made of. Luckily we have two more years, and hopefully by then both parties will have more interesting candidates.
2006-11-07 07:24:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by straightup 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Don't tease me...seriously. I think Barack Obama has the best chance of being our first black president of anyone I've seen, but I just don't know if 2008 is the right year. Maybe 2012?
Al Gore should be president right now, and would be, if it wasn't for Jeb Bush.
2006-11-07 07:31:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by LorraineBates 3
·
2⤊
3⤋
Gore killed any chance he had with his trip to Saudi and accused our government of being prejudice against arabs while we are at war. The only thing that accomplished was to build anti-American sentiment, they don't like us anyway and he had no business putting fuel on the fire. That escapade increased the danger to our troops for his own personal political gain.
Gore has no chance of ever being President now. He will never carry the vote again.
2006-11-07 07:27:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by JFra472449 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
I'll never vote for Gore. He's whipped by his wife. She started the PMRC because their kids were out of control and into drugs. Neither of them were willing to admit that they were lousy parents so they blamed the music. The music that their rich and spoiled offspring bought with their parent's money. Gore is a typical bad parent and he let his wife make a fool of both of them in public, he doesn't get my vote.
2006-11-07 07:27:30
·
answer #11
·
answered by claudiagiraffe 5
·
3⤊
3⤋