Especially with the women? Instead of a lone tear rolling down a cheek, there may have been fainting or a full-blown sobbing episode (with intermittent screams) after falling onto the floor. Or maybe a combination of the two. It may be my imagination, but it seemed like people spoke waaay louder, too. What's your opinion of those bygone movie days?
2006-11-07 06:06:14 · 6 answers · asked by ? 6 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
Yes, overly dramatic theatrical displays was the style of acting in the films of the 30's and 40's. Mostly because many of the performers came from the stage, radio and silent films which relied on heavy dramatic gestures to convey emotion. There were a few exceptions, like Gary Copper, John Wayne and Alan Ladd, who gave quieter performances, but it wasn't until method acting came into vogue, when film performances became more toned down and more realistic.
2006-11-07 06:20:33 · answer #1 · answered by Feathery 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'll admit the acting has changed over the years. Some for the best, some not. I agree that women's reactions to somethings were highly unbelievable, but you have to admit, it gets you into the movie. You could either hate the character for the way he or she behaves or you could love it. I believe it's good to keep watching the old movies to see the beauty in them. But yes, I agree; some were a bit over the top.
2006-11-07 14:18:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of course there was overacting-- think about it, this wasn't too long after silent movies were the norm.... a lot of these actors also acted in them.
With a silent movie, they had to overact because there were no words-- everything was conveyed by motion.
2006-11-07 14:16:24 · answer #3 · answered by Cindy S 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You have a good point. But you know what, I love those movies cause back then, they were flawless: not a hair out of place, always sharp, beautiful dresses when they went out on the town, men wore suits (no matter what), always wore hats.
I just didn't like the cars. Those PT Cruisers remind me of them.
2006-11-07 14:55:52 · answer #4 · answered by dct1218 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i think they acted so dramatically because of their experience with the theatre. Also, they didn't have the technology that we have today so the camera couldn't just pick up a subtle look....it had to be full-blown.
2006-11-07 15:33:24 · answer #5 · answered by carmen3111 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I definately agree with you. Especially those old black and white westerns, terrible over acting.
2006-11-07 14:13:51 · answer #6 · answered by chevygirl6767 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋