English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Would republicans constantly cry about their taxes going to funding all the babies that are waiting for adoptions or for families that need financial help raising them?

2006-11-07 05:44:39 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

15 answers

Yes, they would complain about the cost for child healthcare and all the new taxes. They aren't happy with anything.

2006-11-07 09:49:46 · answer #1 · answered by cynical 6 · 0 1

You are suggesting tha abortion is preventing unwanted babies from being born, and poor people from having more children.

Welfare statistics, and modern psychology defies that.

It isn't the poor people, or even the unwed teenagers that are getting the abortions. The poor decision making that led them to be pregnant in the first place typically prevents them from getting the abortion they should have.

The bulk of abortions are performed on middle-class married carreer women who have decided that they don't want children, and the impact that children would have on their lifestyle.

Learn the facts before you post a slanted question. Abortion should be legal, but not for the reasons you present.

2006-11-07 13:54:46 · answer #2 · answered by Ricky T 6 · 1 1

If abortions were illegal all republicans would be crying about the rising birth rate. No one would want to pay to educate, clothe and feed all of the unwanted babies.

Abortions would go "underground" again and women and babies would be infected from insterile practices. People would die and there'd be an increased prison population.

2006-11-07 13:55:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

No republicans have no problem with helping the truly needy we just think that giving handouts to people who are able to work but don't is wrong.
Those who do not work should not eat!
The greater percentage of private Charity is given by Republicans

2006-11-07 13:50:46 · answer #4 · answered by TEXAS TREY 3 · 2 3

Why would it have to be the government funding people for adptions?? Can't you liberals think of anything without a government handout attached to it?

2006-11-07 13:51:41 · answer #5 · answered by DiamondDave 5 · 2 2

Oh good Lord. See my most recently asked question.

Can ANYONE ask legitimate questions anymore without being degrading or insulting or making negative generalizations?

2006-11-07 13:50:27 · answer #6 · answered by Lanani 6 · 1 2

Yes.

2006-11-07 13:46:51 · answer #7 · answered by capu 5 · 1 3

If u can't handle the potential responsibilites, stop having sex!!! Atleast the babies would be alive!

Totally agree w/ the dude above me!

2006-11-07 13:48:24 · answer #8 · answered by It'sMe23 5 · 2 4

We would probably tell all those f'ers to stop mating like rabbits, or to go to planned parenthood and get some damn birth control.

2006-11-07 13:47:39 · answer #9 · answered by Phil My Crack In 4 · 2 4

Yes. they would. And they wouldn't be telling anyone to go to planned parenthood, because it wouldn't exist. And neither would birth control.

2006-11-07 13:48:48 · answer #10 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 1 4

fedest.com, questions and answers