2006-11-07 05:29:24 · 17 answers · asked by Bouncing on my meat 2 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
First, as I have said on along with this team, they are in the WEAKEST Division in the NFL, full of Lions, Vikes and Packer <---ALL LOSERS weak teams! The Bears are at best a 8-8 team in the REAL NFL. Rex Grossman is a back-up on at least the top 20 teams. I can't believe those idiots in Chicago thinking they are going to the Super-Bowl after beating up the Lions, Vikes and the Packer and surviving the big tough 1-5 Cardinals. The Bears have years to go...they might win that pathetic division but won't make it past the 1st round in the playoffs
2006-11-07 05:42:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
I agree, the Bears have been playing a weak schedule, the next few weeks, we'll see if they have what it takes. However, they have looked pretty solid in all but two games, granted to terrible teams. When their offense, defense and special teams click, they are impressive. Grossman can take most of the credit for the turnovers in those two terrible games, he is, practically, still a rookie. He's only started eight regular season games in three seasons prior to this 2006 campaign. That's not much experience and it shows, plus this team is so hyped as the second coming. (Of the 1985 Bears Super Bowl season team not Christ :). As a Bear fan, I hope he can settle down and play up to the competition with the Pats and Giants on the road. The worst in history? I don't think so.
2006-11-07 06:44:03 · answer #2 · answered by JenJen 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think it's hilarious that fans are so quick to turn their backs on their team. The Bears started out 7-0. They had a bit of a scare against Arizona but still won the game. Yes, they lost to the Dolphins and made a lot of mistakes... but they're not a bad team!!
2006-11-07 05:35:03 · answer #3 · answered by chloe 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Look the Bears looked great, everyone thought they were the best team in football. BUT now that we have seen the struggle with Arizona and Miami, let's take a step back and look at their schedule. THEY HAVE been winning against BAD TEAMS, who is their best win against? A: Seattle, and nobody knows how good they are-but we know they are not good enough to go back to the Super Bowl. Outside of that, they beat up on VERY BAD Teams.
2006-11-07 05:37:29 · answer #4 · answered by Eric 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I don't know in NFL history, but they should be 6-2. I don't think they are that good of a team. We'll see within the next month.
2006-11-07 05:52:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Nahh, just a young quarterback, young offense excluding Muhhamad. Losing to a 1-6 team can happen.
2006-11-07 09:07:43 · answer #6 · answered by cpc_2591 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, they do not compare to the 85 bears and everyone should stop comparing them, there most recent wins have been close and they dont have to go up against any of the "hard teams" making them an easy target when they get to playoffs
2006-11-07 05:55:15 · answer #7 · answered by jason M 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I wouldn't go that far.
Still, they have feasted on a whimpy schedule. Arizona should have beaten them.
Any comparisons to the 1985 Bears are ridiculous.
And I'm sorry, but Rex Grossman has achieved exactly squadoosh in his career. When he has 25 wins, and a couple of playoff wins, maybe some 4th quarter comebacks, you can start the Montana comprisons.
2006-11-07 06:14:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
yes they have the easiest schedule in the world and they shouldn't be 7-1
2006-11-07 06:54:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Not in my opinion - they had an off week. Got caught looking ahead & were overconfident. I'm looking for Bears & Saints in the NFC Championship.
2006-11-07 05:34:04 · answer #10 · answered by byhisgrace70295 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋