English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

18 answers

Not even close. GWB wins.

Bush & company should be tried for war crimes.

but in this world of people seeing in black and white, and believing everything they're told, the guilty can literally get away with murder---and most often do.

2006-11-07 08:05:15 · answer #1 · answered by .. 5 · 2 0

I hope that you are not seriously asking this question. Go back and look at what Saddam has done in the Middle East over the last 40 years. If you really believe Bush has committedd atrocities against the Iraqis then stop and think who has had the longest amount of time in their respective office to committe these acts. You would gain a world of knowledge if you joined the military and formed your own opinion, better yet why don't you go to a country like Iraq a find out how great America is. You would very quickly find out just how many freedoms you have that have been paid in blood by your forefathers.

2006-11-07 12:56:19 · answer #2 · answered by Danny L 1 · 0 0

First off, there are no such people as the Iraqians. There are Iranians and Iraqis. Secondly, Saddam has just been sentenced to death by his own people for his crimes, and they still have not asked Bush to get out of Iraq. Judging by the actions of the ones who know (which is not you, by the way) I would say that Saddam is the one who has committed the most atrocities.

2006-11-07 12:46:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

This is a "duh" question/answer for any thinking person.
* The anti-terror coalition has not gased entire cities, trying to wipe out entire races of people.
* The anti-terror coalition has not gone into cities with helocopters gunning down every thing that moves (men, women, children, livestock).
* Saddam loyalists have killed most of the Iraqis and US service men & women with their cowardly bombing of anything and everyone.
* The US press and Saddam sympathizers add fuel to the radical murders hatred for anything American by making ridiculous statements such as these.

A better question would be how much more good has President Bush and the anti-terror coalition done for the people of Iraq? Furthermore, another good question would be ...How many more attacks would we have had on American soil if we had just tucked our tails between our legs after 9/11 and told the terrorists we didn't agree with them rather than nipping the problem in the bud (look at Nazi Germany for an example of just letting fascism grow)? Before the US went into Iraq, Saddam was on TV every day saying death to Americans and he had already demonstated that he was willing to kill entire races of people when he had an opportunity. Think about it!!! Figure it out on your own!!!

2006-11-07 12:59:54 · answer #4 · answered by Figure it out! 4 · 0 0

Saddam Hussein

2006-11-07 12:45:31 · answer #5 · answered by John C. 4 · 0 3

No self respecting citizen of the US would answer this question in the manner you obviously wanted it answered in.
I agree with nothing Bush has done, but I would never ever ever condone the sitting President or former for that matter, of the US be put on trial for war crimes or any of that nonsense. Stuff like this is the ammunition that republicans use to get others to not vote for democrats.

2006-11-07 12:44:45 · answer #6 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 1 0

people like you should be supervised so you don't stab yourselves in the eyes with forks at the dinner table.

bush has made decisions that are helping the "iraqians" {f'cking idiot} win their freedom. we took a bad man out of power, and are helping them fight off the bad men that are left. unfortunately, freedom-fighting is a nasty business, and sometimes people die. when we reach world war II levels of casualties, like 10,000 troops dying per day, then i'll be concerned with the number of losses we've suffered. as for the dead "iraqians" {god, f'cking idiot}, they died gaining freedom from oppression for their countrymen. a very honorable way to die.

2006-11-07 13:00:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Bush hasn't committed Any atrocities against the Iraqi people, that would be islamic terrorist (remember them) here are a Few of Saddams deeds...
Saddam's henchmen led by Ali Hassan al-Majid (Chemical Ali) used chemical weapons to massacre thousands of Iraqi Kurds in the town of Halabji. The number killed has been estimated between 3000 and 8000
Saddam arrested 90 members of Al Hakim's family and excuted 16 of them.
Saddam has killed many people belonging to opposing political parties. Just some of those examples include: the arrest, torture and execution of Ayatollah Mohamad baqir Al Sadr and his sister Amina Al Sadr (Bint Al Huda) in 1980; and the assassinations of Haj Sahal Al Salman in UAE in 1981, Sami Mahdi and Ni'ma Mohamad in Pakistan in 1987, Sayed Mahdi Al Hakim in Sudan in 1988, and Shaikh Talib Al Suhail in Lebanon in 1994
at least fifty thousand rural Kurds ... died in Anfal alone, and very possibly the real figure was twice that number ... All told, the total number of Kurds killed over the decade since the Barzani men were taken from their homes is well into six figures."
In Basra, the rebellion was met with mass execution of civilians. Some were tied to tanks as human shields and others were tied to rocks and pushed into rivers.
Suspected rebels were executed in large groups in the town's stadium. Some of Shi'a Islam's holiest shrines were destoryed, others used for centers of murder, torture and rape.
women, children, and the elderly were killed in mass executions
regime eliminates an estimated 7,000 Iraqi Communists.
March 1988 The Kurdish town of Halabja is gassed. 5,000 people perish, 10,000 suffer injuries.
The war is estimated to have caused one million casualties including 250,000 Iraqi dead.
Approximately 1,000 Kuwaiti nationals were killed in the Iraqi
invasion of Kuwait. It’s estimated there were 1,500,000 refugees from
this war, displaced by Iraq’s occupation of Kuwait. 750,000 “endured
brutalities, oppression, and torture.
1988, the struggle continued, and
500,000 Iranians were late killed (the Iranians say it was closer to 1
million), 100,000 by Hussein’s chemical weapons. In one day, 5,000
men, women, and children were gassed.
Hussein killed 7,000 prisoners in what was
called “prison cleansing.
Human Rights Watch, estimate that 200,000 to 300,000 Shiites were assassinated in the past two decades by Mr. Hussein's government, which used a network of militias, secret police, and military security forces to create a pervasive police state in Iraq.

2006-11-07 13:10:12 · answer #8 · answered by bereal1 6 · 1 0

Hussein was sentenced to death for killing 148 people. Almost assuredly, he was responsible for the deaths of many more.
George W. Bush has killed 655,000 Iraqis and almost 3,000 U.S. soldiers (not to mention the tens of thousands whom he has permanently injured, disabled, or maimed for life).
While such atrocities should not be measured in body counts (it's just as bad to kill one person as it to kill 6,000,000 Jews), Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and all 535 members of the most evil, selfish, incompetent, contemptible, cowardly, greedy, arrogant, despicable Congress in U.S. history should all be tried for crimes against humanity, and - if convicted - should all hang right alongside Hussein. -RKO-

2006-11-07 12:45:19 · answer #9 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 2 0

Considering Bush has not ordered the gassing of innocent Iraqi's, I have to say Saddam.

2006-11-07 12:43:13 · answer #10 · answered by 3rd parties for REAL CHANGE 5 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers