I feel obligated to vote against some of them if they made the news for pissing people off.
2006-11-07 04:21:28 · 14 answers · asked by MЯ BAIT™ 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I should mention that I am in Arizona.
We do not vote our judges in, we vote whether or not to kick them out.
2006-11-07 04:24:34 · update #1
"pissing people off" is not a good criteria for making a choice. Before you go to the polls, spend a few minutes online looking up the backgrounds of ALL candidates. It's the ONLY way to make an informed choice.
Unless a candidate for ANY office has done something really spectacular to warrent another term, my rule of thumb THIS year is to vote out every single incumbant. You cannot make an informed choice without doing some research. It is time well spent.
2006-11-07 04:27:50 · answer #1 · answered by happy heathen 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
you're talking with regards to the Diebold digital Voter equipment. it somewhat is the 21st century successor to the Richard J Daley Vote early and customarily technique pioneered interior the twentieth century by potential of the esteemed mayor of chicago. persist with the link under to work out the monuments erected to the fairly some maximum prolific electorate in background only before invention of the Diebold technique! Grin
2016-12-10 04:26:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I feel it is not in the best interests of the people that they elect judges to the bench. We know very little about the world of law and should not choose based upon what we perceive as favorable qualities. Judges should do their jobs and judge squarely upon the basis of law and not popularity. So to answer your question I do not vote in this section.
2006-11-07 04:29:14 · answer #3 · answered by You Ask & I Answer!!! 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I leave that portion of the ballot blank. I don't believe in voting for judges, and that the judicial system should be non-political.
2006-11-07 04:26:58 · answer #4 · answered by Mutt 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I always vote NO to retain all of them. If they are changed regularly there will be no point in corrupt people buying them. Are there some good judges that may be removed? Sure. This will keep them that way.
2006-11-07 04:27:11 · answer #5 · answered by outlaw_tattoo_biker 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I voted for the judges that I was familiar with, and left the rest blank. As they are all unopposed, its not like they really needed my vote.
2006-11-07 04:24:34 · answer #6 · answered by rrticulate1 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I always vote against the incumbent judges. I just think its a good idea to keep people from getting too comfortable.
2006-11-07 04:59:52 · answer #7 · answered by Fire_God_69 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Many run unopposed, however, I vote for them as I do all of he others on the ballots. By my informed decision. God bless
2006-11-07 04:30:14 · answer #8 · answered by ? 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I usually vote them all out. Judges need to get shaken up, and regularly, other than that our courts become stagnant and they gain too much power. I'm tired of the judges in our country who seem to diefy themselves. Judges have way too much power IMO.
2006-11-07 04:23:49 · answer #9 · answered by Sativa 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It is really hard to judge a judge as I am not judgmental so I vote for the nicest name....
2006-11-09 01:24:30 · answer #10 · answered by P!ss Ant 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋