Rather than be accused of being "poor losers"?
2006-11-07 03:48:57 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I think any serious violations should be reported immediately--I don't care if its coming from a Whig, Libertarian or whatever. Not to report it and wait for the election to be over then start talking up complaints is so irresponsible--but I'm sure it will happen somewhere this year.
2006-11-07 03:52:11 · answer #1 · answered by rrticulate1 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would rather be accused of being a poor loser and be proved correct, then keep my mouth shut and be led by a bunch of crooks.....oh wait we are led by a bunch of crooks, no matter if we vote dem or rep.
2006-11-07 11:51:23 · answer #2 · answered by FaerieWhings 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, election violations are very serious and should be reported no matter which party is involved or being targeted.
2006-11-07 12:03:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would definitely report it if it is a legit violation you have to keep the elections as legitimate as possible.
2006-11-07 12:11:30 · answer #4 · answered by jordanred17_89 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you are aware of a crime, should you report it? Even if you are on the winning side, you should report it - its the honorable thing to do. Anything less and you are a party to the crime if you are aware of it and do nothing about it.
2006-11-07 11:51:13 · answer #5 · answered by Paul H 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush is opening a freedom umbrella that will rid the world of evil and the left
2006-11-07 11:51:12 · answer #6 · answered by morts 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Who the **** cares if they are accused as such?
2006-11-07 11:51:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, something that is tampered should be exposed.
2006-11-07 11:52:28 · answer #8 · answered by edubya 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋