2006-11-07 03:43:29 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
They have that in Nevada, I don't know of anyplace else that does. But what if none of the above wins?
2006-11-07 03:50:44 · answer #1 · answered by MUD 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Um, how would a 'none of the above' button be productive. Sometimes you just have to vote for the lesser of the two evils.
2006-11-07 11:51:29 · answer #2 · answered by Blessed 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As nice as that would be to send a little protest, you still need to pick the one who seems to be the lesser evil of the 2.
2006-11-07 11:49:05 · answer #3 · answered by low_on_ram 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What is the point of going if you vote for no person? At least write in.
2006-11-07 11:45:00 · answer #4 · answered by E 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No - that would mean that people would be voting for no one!
But you can always write someone in...
2006-11-07 11:49:43 · answer #5 · answered by ItsJustMe 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If we did or if someoneran using that name it would be a land slide victory!
2006-11-07 11:46:15 · answer #6 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
richard Pryor was great, wasn't he? If we still had the old ballots, we could write that in!
2006-11-07 11:45:05 · answer #7 · answered by Jon C 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
we do, its called stay home. you actually want to go and vote, just to not vote?
2006-11-07 11:48:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Then don't vote.
2006-11-07 11:46:10 · answer #9 · answered by "I Want to Know Your Answer 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋