You don't get the complexities all around us, particularly regarding life, from chaos.
So, scientific theories about the origin of things are impossible. Period. I say again, those theories are impossible. It would NEVER happen. NEVER.Things are so complex, you do not even want to know what the odds are. It is ridiculous to not believe in God. No wonder scripture calls unbelief foolish!
2006-11-07
01:16:04
·
15 answers
·
asked by
curious_inquisitor
1
in
Science & Mathematics
➔ Astronomy & Space
cchappa - You need to pay attention. I said theories regarding origins.
2006-11-07
01:26:26 ·
update #1
taknev - I never said that. I said theories about origins.
2006-11-07
01:28:23 ·
update #2
sun of samsa - It can be explained all day why theories regarding origins are impossible. Let me here you explain why there is no creator? When you are surrounded by evidence. Of course you think that about the Bible. You don't believe nothing.
2006-11-07
01:33:42 ·
update #3
surveyor - I see, nothing + nothing = something. Wow, what educated genius!
I don't think so. Nice try.
2006-11-07
17:28:02 ·
update #4
You are right! God's way is the best way and there is no way around it!!!! Those 'theories' are so not logical! I am NOT a monkey! GO GOD!
2006-11-07 02:51:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by katlover118 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
You completely misunderstand the meaning of "theory" as used by scientists. Calling something a "Theory" by no means indicates that the idea is untested, unverified, or that there is serious debate regarding its validity. Scientific theories are "models" that describe some aspect of the physical universe. They have validity if 1) they can accurately describe observed phenomena, meaning they pass experimental test, and 2) they can predict new unobserved phenomena that can then be tested.
To say that the world is soooo complicated that it could never be explained is the easy way to give up trying to understand something that is inherently difficult to understand. Evolution goes on around us every day. Antibiotic resistant bacteria are created by a process of natural selection. Same thing with herbicide resitant weeds. Nobody has a problem accepting that, but accepting that the same thing happens to higher animals over a longer period of time seems to be beyond what those same people can accept.
Regarding complexity. The physics (theory) that is required to understand the behavior of materials, such as silicon, and how that can be used to build transistors so that you can read this on your computer, what your television, listen to your iPOD ...... DID NOT EXIST 100 years ago. Around 1900 there were several really basic problems that perplexed physicists and convinced many of them that there were fundamental aspects of nature that could not be explained. In the early years of the 20th century there was a revolution in physics with the development of new theories that overcame these problems and lead to much of todays technology. Those "theories"??? - Special relativity, general relativity, quantum mechanics.
So just because some one says that some aspect of nature is "too complex" to be explained by a scientific theory, does not mean anything. They could be proven wrong the next day.
2006-11-07 18:08:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by amused_from_afar 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The whole Bible story of creation is a crock.
Acccording to the Bible the Earth was created on a Wednesday sometime in 4004 BCE.
Man was alive before that date. The dinosaurs were around a hell of a long time before that.
You say that the Bible has no complexities over Creationism?
Answer me this:
If God created the Earth, then why did it take Him over 4000 years to claim it for Christianity? Why did He allow heathens to discrace His paradise for four millenia?
If God makes no mistakes and knows all - then why did He create Lucifer and make him so vain, beautiful and arrogant?
Methusulah supposedly live to be over 900, what a load of crock.
No - the Bible has no complexities at all does it?
To believe so firmly in religious dogma is foolish.
2006-11-07 05:39:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by Andrew W 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are apparently more knowledgeable and pious than Roman Catholic Priest Georges Lemaître who developed the Big Bang Theory. He also was a professor of physics and astronomer. He, along with Albert Einstein, did not believe that God would play with dice or, in other words, create chaos. The origin of life is based upon the creation of the universe.
If you think about it, the Big Bang theory, be it true or not, is a more detailed version of "let there be light" and "then He created the heavens and the earth". It's kind of wierd how these guys who wrote the Bible almost 2,000 years ago knew the process.
God would not want your belief in Him to close your mind to knowledge.
"I want to know how God created this world. I am not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know His thoughts; the rest are details." - Albert Einstein
2006-11-07 04:01:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The question of God begs itself. "God exists because the Bible says He does and God wrote the Bible so God exists." Circular arguments like that cannot be proven. Theories on the origin of the universe are based upon very careful calculations which CAN be demonstrated and hypothesized upon, but true enough we cannot prove them, per se, any more than YOU can prove God wrote the Bible and not some very convincing crock back 4000 years ago.
It is foolish to blindly believe in anything.
2006-11-07 01:20:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by sun of samsa 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
you've been the following a month, what makes you imagine you comprehend something about something in any respect ? i will call you Gizmo the newbie. shall we attempt to be actual, which skill use absolute information. The church isn't a information position. it really is a idea position. So comparing it to something it really is meant to be actuality depending is stupid Gizmo wondering. If Gizmo quite understood technology, does not he comprehend it really is in accordance to theory ? issues that are information are disproved continuously. drugs that are used are watched heavily. because they don't genuinely comprehend something for particular. Aspirin became first utilized by technique of the historic Egyptians. How typically is a clean income or challenge found in aspirin ? continuously. The study not in any respect end. How about outer area, Gizmo ? You do comprehend that theory is used to describe, what no one is conventional with for particular . Black holes and huge novas are considered information. yet they are more effective like smart theories. waiting to be disproved. Is Gizmo starting up to confirm that technology is more effective like a chain of questions that not in any respect end. not a house of absolute information as you suggested ? Gee Gizmo if technology doesn't have all the solutions, yet is more effective like an ocean of questions. How can that be compared to any faith ? If we requested those that follow religions, "Do you get information that do not replace, from church ?" they might say sure. because church is in accordance to beliefs. those beliefs are the information that their church teaches.they are established information surpassed down for generations. Their not your information, because you do not believe. yet unlike technology they are unchanging information to a pair. did not you imagine technology became all solutions ? Ask a scientist and they'll say "NO that is all questions." Do i want to describe any farther or do you spot the way you ignored the boat ? I recommend you imagine till now you write, next time. you comprehend on a clinical psychological aspect. galvanize us such as your ideas. Lose the dumb comparisons.
2016-11-28 21:15:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
one thing you are forgetting is that God uses natural things to do his job, like an earthquake to bust paul out of prison, plagues and such to convince pharoh to let the jews go.... every noteable thing done by God was done with natural phenomenon. So if you are claming scientific theory don't work, you are either unread and ignorant, or you are claiming God does not exist since it was God that put it all in place. If God did not do so, then God must not exist so if scientific theory does not exist, God does not exist, and God made everything, then your theory should hold nothing including you and I actually exist. However since I in fact know I exist then you must be wrong.
2006-11-07 01:30:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by dread pirate lavenderbeard 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
To impy that one cannot simultaneosouly believe in God and support scientific theories is arrogant.
Sure, no one gets ALL the complexities around us. But some people understand some of them. It seems you don't get any of them.
Quit being so closed-minded.
If you don't like scientific theories and stuff, then you better not EVER go to a hospital or take any form of mediaction, you hypocrite.
2006-11-07 01:20:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
You obviously suffer from a severe lack of education. I suppose you could pray for knowledge. I personally feel that since it's provided to you at no cost, you would have to be a fool not to take advantage of it. Even God thinks you're an idiot.
2006-11-07 02:44:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe in science and god. If you do not believe in science then you do not believe in god because god gave man the power to evolve and think, and rightful thinking is what science is all about
emmettgolf I agree god does not play dice, but he definitely plays chess, where every move determines what happens next, with infinite possibilities
2006-11-07 01:20:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by taknev 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
That is really not a question, it is a statement. And it has nothing whatever to do with Astronomy or Space; it belongs in the biology or religion sections.
2006-11-07 01:42:52
·
answer #11
·
answered by campbelp2002 7
·
0⤊
0⤋