I havent decided and could use some input. Lieberman has been there for 18 years and is good, but he does side with Bush alot.
Ned Lamont is new and doesnt have much experience with this, but I have a problem with him because he does live in one of the wealthiest towns in CT and you would think at heart he would really be a Republican
2006-11-07 01:14:20 · 12 answers · asked by Perplexed 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I voted for Lamont this morning
He may be new and inexperienced, but despises the war in Iraq as much as I do.
2006-11-07 01:16:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I voted Democrat today, and I like Lieberman. I believe there's WAY too much partisanship out there. I vote for people who put the nation above the Party. Ned Lamont is just as bad as Tom Delay. I may not always agree with Lieberman, but I have 100% confidence that he looks closely at the issues rather than just doing what his Masters at the DNC tell him to do. He has a conscience and a backbone.
If we had more Liebermans and the like - something might get done!
2006-11-07 01:18:51 · answer #2 · answered by itsnotarealname 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lieberman is more for the working man then Lamont who is an elitist that managed to scrape enough votes from kids who's parents are paying for their current university tour. Lieberman has voted time and again for the Democratic party line. The fact is neither he nor Lamont have a lot of say over the Iraqi War and are not going to pull out the troops if it endangers the US. Lamont may try, but he'll be outnumbered even in his own party.
2006-11-07 01:20:31 · answer #3 · answered by MEL T 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I would vote for Lamont. Joe Lieberman is far too cozy with Bush and the Republicans, and I'd be willing to bet that if the Republicans retain control of the senate he'll switch to republican.
2006-11-07 01:20:54 · answer #4 · answered by FrankEs 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
e Joe Lieberman, even though I don't agree with his position on the war. Lamont is an antisemite and made some nasty comments about Mrs. Lieberman's name. I am against all bigotry our various cultures is what makes the US great
2006-11-07 01:21:32 · answer #5 · answered by devora k 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Lieberman may as well be a Republican.
Vote for Lamont.
2006-11-07 01:18:23 · answer #6 · answered by YayforAbortions 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
TY for trying to cast a good and informed vote
Ignore the idiots who answer
Not all those in the GOP are bad Lincoln Chaffee from RI is a good senator
Your choice is a tuff one but you sound more comfy with Lieberman
Besides the real battle seems to be in the house where the Dems have to win to bring some balance back to Govt
2006-11-07 01:23:19 · answer #7 · answered by gdeach 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont live in CT, but I feel that Lieberman is the better man for the job!
2006-11-07 01:18:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anarchy99 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Lieberman is a shill for the republicans, he always has been and always will be.
2006-11-07 01:40:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
... are Con. primaries party certain... in different words... in some states, Republicans can't, notwithstanding in the adventure that they needed to opt for the dem established over the Republican, vote contained in the Dem established... in basic terms registered Dems can vote contained in the established... is Con. like this... or are you able to opt for, like you are able to in some states? this may go some distance in explaining the problem...
2016-11-28 21:15:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋