Is the Lochness Monster real or fake?

Question

Opinions anyone? Any proof?

Answer 1

She's very real. I've seen her with my own two eyes.

Answer 2

Science can only believe in what it can measure. That is the way science works. If you cannot get direct observation or absolute evidence that Nessie exists, then science cannot spend time and energy believing in it. There is as much evidence in fairies as there is in the Loch Ness Monster.

There are thousands of people looking at the loch every day. There are cameras all over the thing. Boats all over it. Yet, no one can get a good film of it and no one can capture one dead or alive. The area of the loch is 21.8 square miles. That may sound like a lot. However, New York City is 300 square miles. Manhatten Island is about 20 square miles. You can just about fit the entire surface area of Loch Ness on Manhatten Island. What does this mean? There is not many places on the surface for a large monster to hide when it comes up, and it must come up judging from the eye witness accounts. If there was a monster, then it would have been seen on a regular basis. The loch is deep, very deep. However, that does not change the limited amount of surface. Loch Ness is big, but not so big that a monster can come to the surface on any regular basis and not be seen. Thousands or even hundreds of sets of eyes should be able to find the creature every day and that should mean reliable photographic or video evidence should come in on a regular basis.

The amount of available food is also very small for a monster. A killer whale needs to eat about 500 pounds of food a day. From the account, Nessie is as big or bigger than a killer whale. Now, lets say Nessie is cold blooded and can get by with less food. Lets say 150 pounds of food a day. That would still be a lot of fish. However, the fish aren't just swimming into the monster's mouth. It has to chase them, so that will up the caloric content which means more pounds of fish. I have never heard about how much plankton there is in the water of Loch Ness, but the monster would have to spend a lot of time cruising and straining the water and would have definately been found by now. Also, actively chasing the fish would result in it being found as well. If there is a monster in there, it needs to be part of a family because it has been spotted for centuries. That means a breeding population must exist because no animal can live forever. A breeding population means thousands of pounds of fish must be consumed in a day to support the monsters and there is just not that much food there.

There is just no real evidence that indicates a monster is in the waters of Loch Ness. In fact, the evidence points the other way. It suggests that a large creature could not survive in Loch Ness unless it could find another food source. Until a biologist makes a detailed film or series of photographs of it or someone can capture one dead or alive or find enough of an identifiable carcas, science will have to say no to Nessie.

Answer 3

that is been a arguable difficulty. Many believe the Loch Ness monster (Nessie) is genuine and is a species of Plesiosaurus that has by some skill existed and escaped extinction. many human beings, both amateurs and scientists have tried to teach its existence and the most extensively customary evidence is the underwater photo taken by technique of Robert Rine on the year 1975 which sows a huge body with a lengthy head and four flippers. yet also there are quite some human beings accessible that doesn't believe it and seem on the Nessie as a hoax. no one quite is conventional with yet as there have been no actual photos or any body parts of the creature if it lives. there have been many photos yet maximum of them teach to be hoaxes and the others are misidentified.

Answer 4

Fake. There is not enough fish or other food in Loch Ness that could support an animal of that size.

Answer 5

I honestly think its true, i think maybe back in the day there was this monster, but also it could be here today in the deepeest parts of the ocean where no man has explored or seen, and he just sits there eating all the fish that cross by or something, just to survive..

BUT

If he or she were to be true, there would have to be alot of them, because a species cant survuve without a mate, unless this animal has some serious heart or something, and he can live for thousands of years.

Answer 6

No, the Loch ness aren't real, there aren't any evidences found that they're real, no one ever saw it.

Answer 7

Just like God, we must assume it is fake as it has not been proven. Why believe in something only because someone told you?

Answer 8

i think it is true
all tho i have no proof, but im pretty sure it is
with all the stuff people have found out, in like the years, ans stuff
im sure its true