Sadaam is to be hanged for Killling 120 People.
Just Thinking what would be the suitable punishment for Bush and Blair for Killing 600Thousand people in Iraq and ruining the country for which it would take more than 25 Years to rebuild now.
2006-11-06 21:25:45 · 15 answers · asked by Suhaeb 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Opps sorry that not 120 its 148.. people chk this link from Sky news.
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-13550448,00.html
2006-11-06 21:34:53 · update #1
i wud just take away their passports and bank balance and leave them as ordinary ppl in iraq for the next 25 years. lets see how they deal with their own created mess, and how they will survive in the country they reduced to rubble.
2006-11-06 21:49:27 · answer #1 · answered by slmanl 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Like some of the others said, this is just the tip of the iceberg. I don't think he's a the top 10 mass murderer for the 20th Century, but he's not far behind.
The problem for Blair and Bush is they didn't take over the country in an orderly manner. They let the country fall into anarchy which is where all the present problems seems to have started.
2006-11-07 09:01:43 · answer #2 · answered by Bad bus driving wolf 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I dont think of there are various governments who ought to place their hands on their hearts and say they have never commited any incorrect doings!! i understand Sadam has achieved a lot incorrect yet i do no longer think he ought to recieve the dying penalty for greater than a number of motives. One reason being that i've got faith the dying penalty is faulty!! no person has the spectacular to take yet another persons existence for any reason regardless of if legalized or no longer!! homicide is homicide and basically God grants existence or take it away. i think of a greater physically powerful punishment for Sadam could be to condemn him to existence in reformatory with complicated exertions. Or make him slave for the persons he oppressed. If this guy is accomplished then in some peoples eyes he could be seen as a martyr or a hero. additionally there has been to many cases the place harmless human beings have been accomplished basically to recieve a pardon later while this is located out they have been infact harmless of the crime they have been accomplished for. What sturdy is a pardon when you're ineffective? (i'm no longer asserting this applys to Sadam). Why have been the persons who have been in touch with sentencing those harmless human beings to dying then no longer charged with homicide as that's what this is. homicide is a pre -pondered act and those human beings knew they have been going to end someones existence. How might you experience if this replaced into your guardian or brother or sister or son or daughter and worse to then locate out years later they have been harmless? You hear on the information daily of harmless human beings being released from reformatory after a misscarriage of justice. What if that they had recieved the dying penalty?
2016-10-15 11:37:18 · answer #3 · answered by gartman 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I suggest that survivors of the GTMO Bay prison camp, the Abu Garib prison, the prison in Kosovska Mitrovica and hell spots like that (as well as survivors of the Silo in Tarcin, the Dretelj prison camp and the Lora camp in Split) will decide what punishment is suitable for Bullshit, Tonica Blairinsky and Penis Clinton. As for Saddam-I think he should be granted amnesty for developing Iraq and for his courage in standing against the above mentioned trio and others.
2006-11-06 22:23:50 · answer #4 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
None of them deserve any punishment. Sadaam , Bush and Blair only did what history required.
2006-11-06 21:31:16 · answer #5 · answered by samssculptures 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont know much about this but I dont think many people like bush and that other guy. They started the war thinking saddam had weapons of mass destruction or whatever. I dont think its right for them to hang saddam. He controlled his country his way and its none of bush's problem. Its all the same, bush started the war now and many ppl lost their lives too. shouldn't he be punished?
2006-11-06 21:34:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Better get your facts straight, Sadaam was in power for around 35+ years, he killed more than 120 people.
2006-11-06 21:28:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Vote them and their parties out of govt and later try them for mass murder, war crimes and lies to the entire world. Their punishment should be life imprisonment to die as whoefully failed leaders that gave humanity misery, grief and sadness
2006-11-06 21:44:55 · answer #8 · answered by Beegee 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Suitable punishment? Having to put up with idiots like you is punishment enough.
2006-11-06 22:57:39 · answer #9 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I am against death penalty, but I supposed that these three guys deserve harsh punishment
2006-11-06 22:04:41 · answer #10 · answered by maussy 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋