If Mitt Romney won the republican nomination, would Christians vote Democrat?

Question

Most all of the Christians that I've ever met take a very dim view of mormons

Answer 1

I could care less what Romney's religion or faith is - he suc**d as the MA gov and would be FAR WORSE as the Prez. I'd even vote for Hillary if she was running against him!

Answer 2

Ron Paul may be the stunning decision ever, not Rudy Giuliani. Rudy Giuliani does not understand that the rustic progression us of a has been doing throughout the time of the last many years is amazingly adverse, wasteful, creates more effective enemies (it really is why there became international warfare I - too many eu countries were u . s . a . progression), and is an extremely grasping flow (u . s . a . progression finally provides more effective money to organizations). Rudy Giuliani would provide more effective capacity to organizations (e.g. emminent area) and would boost the type of unlawful immigrants (a street is going to be outfitted from Mexico by Texas and something of us of a and also you don't want something to get in the course of the street - Rudy Giuliani does not stop that, while Ron Paul would). Ron Paul is nicely studied and is conventional with the parts the position authorities spends too a lot, while Rudy Giuliani is for sure not. Ron Paul is likewise the in basic terms nominee to address the $9 trillion debt us of a faces and many economists help his nomination, because he's the in basic terms nominee who might want to effectively help organisation. Rudy Giuliani will be a negative decision to go adverse to Hillary Clinton - he's a neo-conservative like George Bush and the in basic terms reason she is customary is because diverse human beings hate neo-conservatives and their u . s . a . progression. wager what? Ron Paul would end the warfare in Iraq, stop u . s . a . progression, and, if he were the nominee, would draw those votes faraway from Hillary Clinton. I recommend, no one likes her - the reason they want her to win is because human beings will be determining on the lesser of two evils. Ron Paul is the in basic terms one which has a chance of going adverse to her! So, Rudy Giuliani will be a negative nominee - Ron Paul will be large!

Answer 3

I thought Mormans were christian. So if Mitt Romney won on the Morman vote, he would also be winning on the vote of christians. Democrats vote on a lot more issues than religion alone.

Answer 4

Most Christians I know tend to have common sense. Mitt belongs to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. I believe it is the only church in the world that even bears the name of Jesus Christ in its name. Common sense tells me they must believe in Jesus. They may have different views on various points of doctrine but common sense also tells me so does every other denomination otherwise there would only be one to choose from. As long as he walks his religion and sides with the issues that matter to me he has my vote. Every LDS person I have ever gotten to know has impressed me. I think Mitt will do the same. So to answer the question I think Christians will vote for a successful ex governor who espouses the family values we Christians seem to see a lack of in most of the candidates before us. Yes

Answer 5

Last I checked, Mormons are Christian. I expect most devout Christians will vote Rep.

Answer 6

Wouldn't you vote for someone that had the leadership quality you desired, rather than base it on whether or not they were your religion or the religious background YOU wanted them to have? What about all the Mormons that vote for people who are NOT mormon? Should we stop voting for non-mormons???

Answer 7

Voters will choose the right candidate whoever gets nominated.

Answer 8

Don't forget the catholics, and yes they probably would vote democratic.

Answer 9

i don't know many people that vote specifically for people because of their denomination.

Answer 10

separation of church and state and believe it or not, not all Christians are republican ...