2006-11-06 17:15:31 · 20 answers · asked by seema 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
i think no matter how bad someone is, they shouldnt be sentenced to death.
we all know that sadam was an evil man and he did wrong against his country however he should just be sentenced to a life imprisonment without bail, firstly its more torturoud then just being quickly put to death secondly, nobody has the right to decide when somebody dies.
2006-11-06 17:24:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
So long as U.S.A. occupies Iraq and if the trial of Saddam is not conducted by an International court of law/justice the death sentence passed against Saddam will not be deemed to be fair.
2006-11-07 09:48:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not at all fair. Because we all know that Saddam has killed many people. But still, if the government of Iraq wants him dead, what is the difference between the government and Saddam. Both of them are causing death.
2006-11-07 05:50:28 · answer #3 · answered by Meha 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Being against death sentence, I cannot consider this fair. To me, life sentence would have been better (if I may use this word). That way, he thinks about why he is here until his natural death.
Moreover, I cannot consider fairness and justice coming from a tribunal who has no credibility to me: why wasn't he trialled by the international criminal tribunal, as it has been the case for the genocide in Rwanda, even though this country did not joined the ICT?
2006-11-07 14:31:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think there was no trial at all.The so called USA sponsored trial is an act of murder of a head of state.
UN also has denounced the invasion of Iraq.
So it is simple USA will go on doing this kind of war crime and Bush will be hailed by their people.
Their act of injustice is going to b paid by us,as it will aid the fundamentalist idea in the whole world.
Pres Saddam Hussein has been meted justice by a section of Iraqi people who were powerless before.
So they are now taking revenge,that's all.
If the dummy Iraqi govt can not give protection to deffence lawers then it is clear that Saddam Hussain is still the legitimate President of Iraq,and we people of world has been made to see that injustice by the greatest terrorist of world The USA.
2006-11-07 01:41:17 · answer #5 · answered by priyabrata_1982tripathy 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If I believed in the death penalty, then it's fair. But I don't. & just think, once it's over, it's over. Wouldn't it be better to stick him somewhere that he'd have to live with himself for the rest of his life? THAT would really be punishment! I'm sure there are a lot of people who would just love to WATCH him hang. Por que? Emotional satisfaction? Like the old hangings "in the square" where people brought picnic lunches. Make him suffer. Killing him will not do that.
2006-11-07 01:30:00 · answer #6 · answered by Valac Gypsy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Does it matter? Sure he has a mega bad dude, but he was the legitimate ruler of his country at the time. Let the Iraqi's do what they want with him. I'd be suprised if he lived long enough to be hung tho.
2006-11-07 01:26:07 · answer #7 · answered by GuZZiZZit 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
May be fair if verdict were to be given by an independent country court. "B" should be punished first for killing huge numbers of innocent people of Iraq.
2006-11-07 02:20:23 · answer #8 · answered by princeatheart 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I will give my opinion as an Iraqi .. It's fair enough as I don't think that there is a human being can imagine what did this man do ???? with his people ..
2006-11-07 02:22:55 · answer #9 · answered by paymanal_jaff 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hey answer this question after you check out loosechange.com WARNING: this video is an hour and a half long and may provoke dissapoinment in our gov't. This is what really happenend on 9/11! Lemme know what you think... minimike_1107@yahoo.com
2006-11-07 02:03:38 · answer #10 · answered by mommajen 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋