Ethnic cleansing isnt a big deal or anything, just wonderin'.
2006-11-06 16:36:41 · 8 answers · asked by kool_rock_ski_stickem 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The ethnic clensing of the Serbs recently was the largest since WW2. Makes your numbers pittiful.
2006-11-06 16:41:41 · update #1
He gave NATO american aircraft and weapons. Most of their forces were american armaments
2006-11-06 16:49:55 · update #2
Toops there protecting a muslim land grab.. Sad...
2006-11-06 16:53:12 · update #3
Thumbs down from your geeks for this question...Because it isnt about Iraq or oil?
2006-11-06 16:54:17 · update #4
Did you forget about "Slick Willie"? There's your answer! The man has done more to redefine American English than anyone since John Dewey messed with our spelling. ; )
2006-11-06 16:44:23 · answer #1 · answered by tantiemeg 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
You could ask a similar question about the top leader's reactions to what's happening today in Darfur.
Should Clinton alone be particularly singled out as the only one guilty of not taking action in the case or serbia? (Clinton backed NATO anyway, did he not?)
2006-11-06 16:48:01 · answer #2 · answered by tvdh 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
A. we'd want to continually have enable them end the activity. yet NATO can't enable such issues as that take position. they ought to kill the human beings who had a correct to the land. yet i wager not. it type of feels the objective of NATO and the european is to create as many Islamic states on eu soil as accessible.
2016-11-28 21:02:19 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sir, unless you were in Europe, or in the Military in Europe, you are not qualified to comment!
You do have your right to free speech, but with that right comes responsibility! When you publicize your thoughts, and they are derogatory to others, then you have the responsibility to have the facts, Know what you are talking about and can give valid proof to support your position.
Other wise you should keep your mouth shut!
Your statement suggest that you have never been off of the Continent of America, at lest not for thirty days at one time!
2006-11-06 16:47:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
For the same reason Bush isn't prison for aiding in the death of 655,000 people in Iraq. There just above the law ....................
2006-11-06 17:00:29 · answer #5 · answered by bradship4u 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He didn't aid in the cleansing; he didn't do enough to stop it, but that's very different than actively participating in the genocide.
2006-11-06 16:46:46 · answer #6 · answered by JerH1 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Don't we still have troops over there? Will they be home for Christmas?
2006-11-06 16:51:40 · answer #7 · answered by scarlettt_ohara 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because he wasnt in serbia when it happend.
2006-11-06 16:41:26 · answer #8 · answered by Rocketman 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋