English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

How did the industrial transformation after the Civil War compare with the earlier phase of American economic development? Why the economic developments of 1865-1900 often were seen as a threat to American democracy, whereas those of 1815-1860 were not?

2006-11-06 15:47:24 · 3 answers · asked by Vienna 3 in Education & Reference Homework Help

3 answers

i dunno sori i knew that but i forgot.............

2006-11-06 15:58:27 · answer #1 · answered by sydney 2 · 0 0

i do not want to be disrespectful to the reminiscence of a loved president. many stuff that Ronald Reagan did were important for this u . s . a ., yet Reaganomics had some important issues. For one component, it created a wide deficit. In 1981 on the starting up of the Reagan administration the deficit became about 2.5 % of the nationwide economic equipment. by technique of the best it became about 5 % of the nationwide economic equipment. interest funds in basic terms on that debt went from $sixty 9 billion in 1981 to $169 billion on the best of the Reagan administration. With that type of deficit, finally you've were given to pay the piper. there's an afternoon of reckoning, and the day of reckoning got here with a wide recession in 1990 and 1991. i purchased a house in 1982. The interest cost became 19%.

2016-11-28 21:00:59 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

there were no wars in1815-1860? we developed faster now that the whole issue was solved. except for dept. democrats were FOR slavery so whne slavery was abolished... they were a little shaky.
our econemy boomed till 1900 the revolotion then the depression. when you are at war you tend to invent more to discover more before your enemy does, ex: ww2 world powers struggled to make first nuclear weapon. not sure if any of this helped lol

2006-11-06 15:58:16 · answer #3 · answered by Kenny 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers