2006-11-06 15:18:36 · 6 answers · asked by Kurious 2 in Sports ➔ Cricket
ICC have to honour the majority opinion and as majority wanted stern action against Darrell Hair, they had no other alternative, but to take such an action. I strongly feel that this will be an eye
opener to all the Umpires.
2006-11-06 15:38:19 · answer #1 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Heh heh...now that ICC is no longer the The International Council for Causcasians, there are voices all around. Where were all these questions all these years?
2006-11-07 00:27:13 · answer #2 · answered by pressurekooker 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
YES, THE ICC HAS BEEN HARSH TO DARRELL HAIR
HAIR IS ONE OFFICIAL WHO DOES NOT ALLOW ANY
PLAYER TO BREAK THE RULES OF THE GAME,LIKE
ILLEGAL BOWLING ACTION.
CRICKET FANS FEEL CHEATED WHEN PLAYERS
DON'T PLAY ACCORDING TO THE RULES.
WHEN HAIR RAISED OBJECTION OVER BOWLERS' ACTION,ATLEAST A MEDICAL INVESTIGATION FOLLOWED AND THE MATTER BECAME CLEAR TO ALL CRICKET FOLLOWERS.
BEST REGARDS,
2006-11-07 01:47:31 · answer #3 · answered by Aq 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Nope !!! the decision was made by majority of the members who wanted him out of ICC,i think he is duly punished. he was already planning to quit the umpiring so i think it doen't make any difference whether he is thrown out or he quit himself.
2006-11-07 02:49:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
NOPES!!.. decision is absolutely right!!! He deserve it!
2006-11-07 05:00:20 · answer #5 · answered by TheGuy0fUrDreaMs 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
warning would have been fine
2006-11-07 01:09:26 · answer #6 · answered by john 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋