English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Amazing how stupid leftists are....honest to God...so so so stupid.

I remember George Clooney saying "if it wasnt for liberals, blacks would still be in the backs of buses!!" You kidding me? How unfathomably stupid do you have to be to retro-actively claim that, in some other time, historical figure X and Y was really a modern day liberal?

But if we must play this game....who were the abolishinists? Were they not super conservative Christians? Uhh...yea...yea they were! Wasnt Lincoln a Republican? Wasnt the Civil Rights bill a Republican Bill!! Havent I just listed all the major instruments of the civil rights movement!!!

Im agonostic...I need to put that out...but to further my point...do you know who were the few outright refusniks in Germany during the holocaust? Yep, stubborn fundy Christian pockets in rural Germany who believed it was against their religion to turn in Jews.

The kicker is, like self righteous Islamists, leftists believe they hold the moral; high ground.

2006-11-06 14:49:46 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

14 answers

that is a kicker, isn't it? but you can't confuse liberals with logic. they can't handle logic or debate the issues. don't confuse them with facts either, they just twist it around. the shame is there is a multi billion dollar busines backing this group think idiocy called the mainstream media..

2006-11-06 14:54:50 · answer #1 · answered by Teresa A 3 · 3 2

i'm only waiting for bill or Hillary Clinton come out with a remark approximately this planned burning of the Quoran' the two a variety of two idiots participated in burning the U. S. flag mutually as attending college in England. i do no longer consider what the pastor is doing and that i do no longer consider all of us burning the yank flag. they have the constitutional ideal to do those issues no count how stupid it may seem to the rest human beings. Is the burning of the Quorans possibly to reason issues ? probable yet isn't the construction of the cultural midsection and Mosque a pair blocks away additionally going to reason issues? How appropriate to the day that the Muslims have chosen to open the cultural midsection? That date is 09/11/2011 the tenth anniversary of the WTC destruction. EDIT: precisely while do the liberals think of that we would desire to consistently supply up backing down? Do they think of enjoying advantageous has worked? Hell if something it somewhat is getting worse. @pals to all there's a mag that would help human beings take care of all of those Church burnings besides as vehicles and human beings being beheaded via the radial Muslims. The call of that magazine is named "weapons and Ammo"

2016-10-21 09:50:10 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I don't think liberals for the most part are stupid. I think there are two categories. One is ignorant, or brainwashed. The other is blinded by arrogance, or some other emotion. The same can happen to conservatives really. Any political movement can be caused by hatred, or some emotional reaction. You can be brainwashed in any direction. I think the thing that bothers me the most about liberalism, is the double-standard, the lack of spine, the hypocrisy, and how they embrace thier petty issues and take the higher ground. Conservatives can make me mad too because they sometimes just insist they are right, and aren't open to discussion, and use lots of stupid slogans like "we're in a republic, not a democracy". I wish we could just debate the issues rather than call names, but if you don't have any facts to back your argument you have to accuse the opponent of not having a good heart.

2006-11-06 15:00:16 · answer #3 · answered by The Bible (gives Hope) 6 · 1 0

and the right wingers believe they are self righteous and hold the truth. Right wing conservatives want to CONSERVE the way thing are - no change. Therefore someone who is a conservative thinker wouldn't want the slaves emancipated, or separate from Britain during the revolution - and speaking of Nazism, it is placed on the right wing side of the political spectrum, along with fascism. Liberals want to LIBERATE people from the old ways, and set them free, and allow them to think for themselves. Yes Lincoln was a Republican, but just because the name of the party is still the same, doesn't mean it's ideals haven't changed. Any of the early Republicans would be turning in their graves if they saw what a totalitarian corrupt, greedy organization their party has become today.

2006-11-06 14:58:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Liberal is not a political party, and liberalism is not modern . Liberalism is a political philosophy.
Yes Lincoln was a republican, but his philosophy was liberal.
And the civil right bill was a liberal document for it's time. Look up the word in the dictionary.

2006-11-06 14:59:16 · answer #5 · answered by October 7 · 1 2

HONEY, DON'T KID YOURSELF!

no, i don't agree with clooney's statement. its neither here nor there in an arena where the past is unchangeable.

however, here's the thing. modern day republicans and modern day democrats are RADICALLY DIFFERENT than republicans and democrats in those times. they are not the same political parties. come on, did you ditch all of US History in 11th grade (standard public school grades) or what?

and the christian of germany who had it in their hearts to not comply with genocide have absolutely nothing to do with america, sorry. although i am sure they helped a lot, there has never been any evidence that the christians of germany were behind all of the opponancies of hitler. in fact, hitler used much of his religion (contrary popular belief) to further his cause, as he believed that christianity would justify what he was doing.

i had 1/4 of my family die in the concentration camps of nazi germany (aushwitz, berkenau, bergen-b.) and have personally experienced racism (even in los angeles), but if you are going to reference such atrocities please do not strip the victims of their dignity by not getting such basic facts right.

i see no need to reply to the islamists comment: not only is it neither here nor there, it is completely unsupported by even a tidbit of evidence.

2006-11-06 15:01:43 · answer #6 · answered by cc41girl88 2 · 1 1

Nutcase inbred conservatives sure can't get the job done. To give you an idea on how dumb the folks on the right are, check out which states have the lowest S.A.T scores. ITS RED STATES.

Why do people on the right always accuse colleges of being liberal? BECAUSE THEY'RE THE ONLY ONES WHO GO TO COLLEGE.

Quick what do you call a Conservative in college? A janitor. Conservatives are so dumb that most of their family during the civil war fought for the west.

And can religious Conservatives please stop trying to molest little boys (Catholic Priests, Foley, etc).

2006-11-06 14:58:23 · answer #7 · answered by REMY D RETURNS 2 · 2 3

Its not hard to see who can claim the moral highground here. Conservatives founded a party wholely devoted to abolishing slavery. Liberals brought to power KKK members Robert Byrd and David Duke.

2006-11-06 19:46:58 · answer #8 · answered by FabMom 4 · 0 1

If you define liberal as being "not bound by tradition" (thank you meriam-webster) than it pretty much fits any great leader.

You don't read in history books "and so he did the exact same thing that people had done for generations and nothing changed". You read about people who weren't afraid to chalange the norms.

2006-11-06 15:04:03 · answer #9 · answered by Molly 2 · 1 1

Just to correct you, the fundies in germany were the ones killing the Jews not saving them...

2006-11-06 15:10:01 · answer #10 · answered by John S 4 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers