Here are the prosecutor's comments:
Mr Lawson said: "The principal object [was] to kill hundreds if not thousands of innocent people without warning, but there were other subsidiary and collateral objectives - to cause maximum damage to property, injure and terrorise people and at minimum to cause widespread disruption and subsequent economic loss."
___
If you need more help, here is the link:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=414824&in_page_id=1770&ico=Homepage&icl=TabModule&icc=NEWS&ct=5
2006-11-06
14:10:10
·
9 answers
·
asked by
nobody
5
in
News & Events
➔ Current Events
cork,
You asked "Seriously, could not that have been BUSH March 2003?"
Bush is not driven, by a religious duty of jihad to kill innocent people that don't share his worldview. Remember jihad is one of the five pillars of Islam. He doesn't act out of the instruction given to him from a literal interepretation of the Koran. Please take your moral equivocation elsewhere.
2006-11-06
15:16:09 ·
update #1