Compare the US to Iraq. Republicans=Militants Democrats=negotiators do you agree?

Answer 1

I hope like heck the Democrats do not win, then. You cannot negotiate with terrorists. It's kill or be killed with those radicals, and I really hope we don't find this out the hard way.

Answer 2

I guess you fell asleep during the 15+/- years that 3 different presidents attempted to negotiate with the real Militants, including the 3 years after thousands of people died in the collapse of the WTC. Let's not forget there were 8 years in there that one of your beloved Democrats FAILED to solve the problem.

Answer 3

Republicans = Militants NO

Democrats = Negotiators YES

Jimmy Carter tried to negotiate with these psychos for over a year while they held American hostages.
That worked well, eh?

Karljt - The hostages were held by Iranian Islamic radicals - in Iran.

Answer 4

Some are some aren't many democrats voted for the war in Iraq and also vote in lock step with the Republicans I hope everyone takes a real good look at their respective candidates...many candidates that call them selves Democrats you would not be able to tell when you look at their voting records.
Vote for real change tomorrow!

Answer 5

It is totally impossible to "negotiate" with someone who wants to kill you. So obviously if you call Republicans "Militants", then that's the only way to go.

Answer 6

To negotiate, you must find common ground to agree upon.

How do you negotiate with someone that wants the very minimum of you and all like you dead.

Do you think that Muslims would allow liberals to survive if they ruled. If they did at all, it would to be their slaves and serve them like dogs. The Muslim faith is 180 degrees from Liberal beliefs. No abortion, no gays, no women's rights, no rights period. Get a clue dude, they want you dead too.

Answer 7

i think of of you're evaluating apples to oranges. i'm additionally happy you ought to settle on suited which wars are justifiable and that are easily no longer. you could prefer to be in value of the country with those kinds of credentials. in my opinion, i do no longer comprehend why or as rapidly as we would prefer to continuously artwork mutually in conflicts. I do have the opinion that the UN would prefer to take an energetic section in policing the worldwide. in spite of the undeniable fact that the a number of comments from the distinctive worldwide places makes them ineffective. yet it extremely is yet yet another question. we seem unwillingly caught in that place. i'm a proud grandmother with a substantial investment in teenager's well-being care. i've got have been given self concept mum and dad are responsible for their toddlers. i've got not got self concept the federal government is responsible nor do I prefer their interference. each and each factor comes at a value, and the federal government already thinks it's going to be waiting to steer toddlers in how they're raised and how they think of of. So, no thank you, we are able to attend to our own well-being care matters.

Answer 8

US wanted oil while Iraq wanted arms.
Republicans are conservatives while militants are aggressive.
Democrats are liberals but they are not negotiators.

Answer 9

I think the republicans got it right, at least let some lib try to negotiate with a terrorist who wants to cut there throat for Allah! We shall see what happens to the libs when they find out they just want to kill infidels as apposed to talking to them!

Answer 10

I believe democrats will always negotiate first but will also fight when they have to. I think most Republicans not all would first try something and turn millitant far faster them democrats.