why did George W. Bush ignored the advice of John Negroponte, his national intelligence director?
2006-11-06 11:38:09 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
God you are dumb.
2006-11-06 11:39:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
Now, Neddie, you know you will not get one good answer from anybody affiliated with the repuglican party, or feels like they belong. The real answers is George Bush only listens to three of his advisers. Karl Rove, Dead eye Dick Cheney, and most important then those two is Rush Limbaugh, I think that is where Bush gets his drugs.
2006-11-06 11:47:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
This is not the direct result of a law. As chief executive he has the authority to classify or declassify federal documents. He also has the authority to delegate these powers, always bearing responsibility for the use of these powers.
Otherwise, it was definitely a bizarre act, posting openly instructions on the making of such a WMD.
2006-11-06 11:44:20 · answer #3 · answered by kennethmattos 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
According to you libs, every time the mailman drops a letter in apuddle or a soldier misses the toilet the president must be impeached for not doing his job. He is a leader not GOD. He cannot do every aspect of government work or look over everyones shoulders. If he could he would get the Republican dream... small Gov't.
2006-11-06 11:48:15 · answer #4 · answered by Texan Pete 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I didn't get to see the documents in question, as they were removed when the NYT suddenly started to care about "classified information". However, it did state that these were Iraqi documents. Does that mean he was working on WMD?
2006-11-06 11:51:11 · answer #5 · answered by MEL T 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
none, he was pressured by the repubs, to show the world what they have found in Iraq. Good thing they took that off. Oh, just for the record, the article says that such was found in Iraq...WMD's...in Iraq... found
2006-11-06 11:43:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
That never happen, Saddam didn't have Nuculear Weapons.
2006-11-06 11:54:32 · answer #7 · answered by freemanbac 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
All I can say is he is George W. Bush what do you expect I don't expect too much from any Bush, and I am never disappointed.
2006-11-06 11:42:34 · answer #8 · answered by inmate3685 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Typical liberal. You miss the substance of the matter.
Saddam was a YEAR AWAY from an atomic bomb. According to that report. And I thought you guys thought he was harmless?
2006-11-06 11:42:04 · answer #9 · answered by John 3 · 6⤊ 2⤋
I suppose hes behind all the porn sites too!!!
2006-11-06 12:58:47 · answer #10 · answered by Katz 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey! Those were Sad Dam's plans for WMDs that he never had!!! Guess he DID have the WMDs!!!
2006-11-06 11:42:45 · answer #11 · answered by Bawney 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋