...and that even though he admits buying the meth, that he didn't actually use it???
I would have found it more believable if he said he had never met the prostitute. What about you? Do you know people that go to prostitutes for back rubs?
2006-11-06 11:33:28 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I did not believe him at all. It really shows how stupid people think the general public is...because they think we'll buy their lies, no matter how ridiculous. But since then he has confessed to all of it. He admitted to the sex and drugs. I can't say I'm at all surprised.
2006-11-06 11:36:44 · answer #1 · answered by Amelia 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Haggard is not the head of Focus on the Family. That would be James Dobson.
Haggard was the head of the National Evangelical Association and pastor of New Life Church.
2006-11-06 12:05:02 · answer #2 · answered by Ceci 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Haggard is not from Focus on the Family. That is Dobson.
Haggard fell because Haggard quit doing God's work and started doing Haggard's work. He became more interested in politics and banning gay marriage than spreading the Word of God.
"Go ye therefore, and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them into the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit: teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I commanded you: and lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world” (Mt. 28:18-20 ASV)," This specific call to action by Jesus gives Christians a singular purpose in life. It does not call ministers/pastors to become political power brokers, but to be the trumpets of Jesus' impending return.
2006-11-06 11:42:44 · answer #3 · answered by erictompkins1970 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
in case you have been a sturdy little Republican spouse i could say - do only like something of them.provide up your pastime,persist with for welfare,restoration up the porch on the trailer with some effective Astro-turf and a backyard chair,provide the neighbor teenagers some nutrition Stamps to expire get you a chilly brew and get on along with your existence.
2016-12-17 05:23:45 · answer #4 · answered by wetzel 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not even a little bit. And there's no way that this was the first time either.
Does anyone believe the phrase: Yes, I smoked, but I did not inhale.
2006-11-06 11:37:35 · answer #5 · answered by Manny 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He's not from Focus on the Family, is he? Not that that changes that what he did was wrong, just don't want to cast all Christian groups with the same stone.
2006-11-06 11:36:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
It's just sad. Whenever something like this happens to a leader in the Christian community, the entire community suffers.
2006-11-06 11:45:49 · answer #7 · answered by IslandGal 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I feel bad for the guy and his family, but how dare he have spoken so strongly against gay rights when he was engaging in that behavior. One can forgive someone who slips from his ideals but I am so sick and tired of the hypocrisy. Over and over again.
2006-11-06 12:06:47 · answer #8 · answered by ash 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Enough already. He admitted about the meth, copulating with a male prostitue. He has resigned in disgrace and I find him repugnant but it's time to let it go.
2006-11-06 11:36:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I thought that he admitted to sexual immorality. I could have been wrong. It's a sad situation any way it goes. I feel for the family.
2006-11-06 11:35:30 · answer #10 · answered by ♪♫♪justpassingby♪♫♪ 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋