Bush says that this proves him right. Did that mean he had his doubts and lead Americans to belive something he feels only half-heartedly? And with this...does his hanging justify the death of many Americans on 9/11? OR it has no relation to 9/11 and only to the 100-some Shiate Muslim he killed during while in power. If that's the case, will America then pull out of the war on Iraq? And on the last note, is Sadam's death put an end to war on terror then or do you think America is in more danger now.
2006-11-06 11:30:05 · 8 answers · asked by Clock Watcher 4 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
The war in Iraq has nothing to do with Sadam.......supposedly, it has to do with finding the terrorists/Bin Laden.....hmmm...or maybe it was the weapons of mass distruction.....oh wait, we couldn't find those either.....But I bet we found oil!!! That's what we're really concerned about, get over there and get that oil before they set fire to the plants!
Yeah, we got Sadam and sentenced him to death in the process....great job, whoopee..... I think this whole war is about money, oil and power. Nothing more. Bush doesn't give a crap about the people in the middle east being well, or free....all he cares about is golf, showing up his dad, and money. It is my opinion that he is the single most distructive entity that has ever held our presidential office. We will all continue to suffer, long after his term is over......because of his lack of forsight, his ego, and his greed.
2006-11-06 11:44:20 · answer #1 · answered by LoveBiologist 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i'm from the Philippines. no you may go adverse to Sadam in his own u . s . a . he managed each and every thing. Many Iraqis tried to yet failed. you want a more suitable hand... and that is Uncle Sam. something are the casualties of warfare and the U. S. paid so dearly too. a quarter billion income line with month is diverse money.. i imagine it really is the reason US economic equipment is suffering. Plus the U. S. soldier who died in the course of the invasion. that is all about oil.. and also you may stumbled on diverse in center East. and also you're correct with the Western appearing as police for the international without them... no u . s . a . will be secure.
2016-11-28 20:46:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The war on Iraq was declared shortly after 9/11 (which Saddam had nothing to do with) and there were no weapons of mass destruction! So, no, I do not think the killing of thousands of innocent lives (troops and civilians) can be justified.
2006-11-06 16:24:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
In one word, "NO!"
There are so many answers but I am tired and am powerless to do anything so I shut up for the most part. Anyway -----
Bush was wrong.
He always knew there were no WMD's. Only oil!
No. No justification on that point. Oil!
No relation to 9/11. Oil!
Again, no. No relation to shiites. Oil!
No. Not a chance. Oil!
No. No end. Oil!
Perhaps.
2006-11-07 06:13:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Killing people who kill people to show that killing people is wrong is nonsense, but that's what the death penalty is.
Saddam never had anything to do with terrorism in the US or with 9/11 or WMDs.
Putting Saddam Hussein to death accomplishes nothing, and certainly has nothing to do with the deaths of 2800 american service men & women, or the hundreds of thousands of Iraqis who have died since the invasion (a number far greater than Saddam is ever purported to have killed)
IMHO,
;-)
2006-11-06 11:41:39 · answer #5 · answered by WikiJo 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Considering the billions of dollars spent, thousands of lives lost, countless families destroyed.......all to get a guy who was not responsible for 9/11 at all. (Which is why we went to war in the first place, if I remember right).
So my answer is a most definite NO!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-11-06 11:39:57 · answer #6 · answered by frenchy62 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
How many Trillion to execute 1 leader and how many wasted lives and horriblely disabled? Well NO!
2006-11-06 11:34:17 · answer #7 · answered by RJ 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
should be a hellva show
2006-11-06 11:37:54 · answer #8 · answered by onethousandmilesfromnowhere 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋