English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

As if blacks are just whites with darker skin and that's it. I find it hard to believe that in this day and age people can still believe this but it's true.

If that's the case, then why was a heart medication awhile back approved only for blacks?

An anthropolgist can look at various skulls and he can determine whether it was a caucasoid, *******, or mongoloid.

Would this be the case if it was just skin? I think not.

2006-11-06 11:26:12 · 6 answers · asked by Ellesmere 3 in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

6 answers

Well people´s bodies adapt to their surrounding. People who do not wear shoes will more often have tougher feet with more hair because the body changes to protect itself... The heart medication was due to a difference in blood cell types.

But as for the matter of actual personality and lifestyle, most of the world is the same on a few key points. They love their families, they feel the same feelings and they want similar things. I know this from a first hand experience living in Brazil. While the people are darker and speak a different language, it is comforting to know that their base values are similar to my own.

2006-11-06 11:32:14 · answer #1 · answered by Karaden 2 · 2 0

You're touching that THIRD RAIL OF DEATH my man!

The problem is that there was considerable conversation in years past that white people were genetically superior. That "Fact" was "proved" by early versions of the SAT college entrance exam, for instance (was one reason it was introduced).

In order for the American civil rights movement to go anywhere, stereotypes about physical differences were played down, until one cannot make any comments w/o scorn.

For instance, can black people really jump higher, and is that the reason why there are more black pro basketball players? I dunno. Are black men (how do I say this nicely) "gifted" in their manhood?

Sadly, this game is played both ways in the civil rights movement. If you ask a civil rights activist (which I have) "Beyond skin color and hair texture, are there any differences between black people and white people" you won't get an answer. It's something that they don't want to answer -- in one direction they fight the battles of the past, and in the other direction they give up the notion of affirmative action.

2006-11-06 11:33:59 · answer #2 · answered by geek49203 6 · 1 0

actual human DNA is ninety 9.9% alike no count number what race. that is been stumbled on that the percentage of genetic transformations between human beings of different races isn't any more effective than the percentage for persons interior an same relations. there is in basic terms 3 sections in our DNA that determines our race inclusive of our hair texture, pores and skin tone, facial positive homes and so on. all of the different sections of DNA are an same. Oh you sneaked typical intelligence in there (sure the suitable be conscious is sneaked not snuck, snuck is a made up be conscious. Hmmm how did a black human being with inferior intelligence comprehend that?) Please, have you ever been examining "Bell Curve" or "the actuality of Human transformations"? provide me a wreck with all the "clinical racism" have you ever not in any respect taken an IQ attempt? nicely I have or perhaps although my IQ is 134 i do not see how a attempt with puzzles and kinds can tell someone how smart they are. If I provide an IQ attempt to someone residing contained in the Congo who hasn't ever had any type of modern technologies, formal education, and doesn't comprehend a puzzle from the guy contained in the moon obviously his IQ will be a lot less than the favourite. IQ checks are socially suitable; in case you took an IQ attempt suitable to their ecosystem how nicely would you do. besides, does nature or nurture confirm IQ? and do not tell me that the ratings are adjusted to consider their ecosystem. that is been shown that IQ will boost as you study more effective. nutrients also impacts IQ. Why are impoverished human beings more effective in all chance to have decrease IQ's? human beings have discounted that by technique of exclaiming the reason of their poverty is the lack of intelligence. it really is a lot a lot less complicated to assert someone is in basic terms inferior than to imagine abstractly. also, keep in mind that many of the study on IQ and race became achieved contained in the 20's-60's. i encounter it very puzzling to believe, fairly after growing to be up in a predominately white community the position i became in a lot of situations more effective smart than my friends, that white everyone is genetically more effective smart than Blacks or different races. From what I have considered residing the first 10 years of my existence in a predominately black section and the ultimate 15 in a predominately white section, it has more effective to do with the disparities between the favourite of education in black colleges as compared to white. yet I see you're in basic terms a devil's recommend so that you're good with me brother.

2016-11-28 20:46:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You have it backwards, though; whites are really very light skinned blacks. Now, what was the rest of the question?

2006-11-06 11:28:40 · answer #4 · answered by queenly 1 · 1 1

I AGREE WITH MANY THINGS YOU STATED. SAME GOES FOR THE MALE/FEMALE ISSUE. WE ARE ALL DIFFERENT EVEN IF WE ARE THE SAME "RACE" AND OR GENDER.

2006-11-06 11:29:13 · answer #5 · answered by nanny4hap 4 · 0 0

Because that is what the democrats say.

2006-11-06 11:28:30 · answer #6 · answered by pantherpink25 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers