English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

17 answers

Not much that can be done about things which don't need Congressional approval. But, his legislative program - such as it is - won't get through a Democratically controlled House and/or Senate. The abuse stops when a new Congress goes into session - thank God!

2006-11-06 11:36:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

sure. by technique of nature, Mitt Romney has been a huge bully considering that early existence. As we've considered on the debates he's not a crew participant. As we've heard from the MASS state Congress, he doesn't play by technique of the guidelines. As we've considered by technique of TEN years of paying NO taxes, he has no understand for authority. As we've considered from the Salt Lake city Tribune, his own human beings do not believe him. As we've considered on the information, he deeply indignant the British even as he visited for decrease than some days (fundraising). If he has no understand for our allies why might want to we predict of he will have any understand by any skill for our enemies??? even as President Obama had the Doomsday Clock actually grew to change into decrease back, Romney would deliver it to an extremely quick flashpoint. Romney epitomizes each and every thing the international hates about individuals: being a BULLY and being grasping. He has as a lot as suggested he will make certain the international is conventional with who's the Boss!!! OMG. Having that guy be President would ruin existence as all of us comprehend it. whats up - yet he's a good Wall street salesman!

2016-11-28 20:45:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes, but they shouldn't. The expected results is that someone else will be worse. The executive branch is supposed make sure the laws of the country are enforced. Bush has neglected our domestic national intrests and has focused on international issues. The rest of the world very much resents us for this reason.

Bush should not be impeached, but should be held accoutable.

2006-11-06 11:26:47 · answer #3 · answered by Paul K 6 · 1 2

well he only got 2 years in this 4 year term, so the only way I see him not being in power any longer is if some sort of revolt happens or he gets impeached.

2006-11-06 11:21:30 · answer #4 · answered by ScientiaEstPotentia 3 · 1 0

As I understand it, regardless of the imminent vote, he's in power for another two years anyway, unless he gets impeached or dies.

All I can say is that once he's gone, the American people have a lot of apologies to make to the rest of the world.

2006-11-06 11:27:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

I HELLBENT am going to let George Bush protect me for another 2 years.

2006-11-06 11:26:29 · answer #6 · answered by HELLBENT 2 · 2 2

uh, he is the president for another 2 years, what are we going to do.

I am not saying i think he should be reomoved from office, but what are you suggesting?

2006-11-06 11:21:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6 0

Constitutionaly he will stay in power until Jan 2009 unless someone can find something to impeach him by. However, he has yet to do a single impeachable thing

2006-11-06 11:20:57 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 7 2

well 2 points what i get

2006-11-06 11:23:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Did you get the licence number of that truck?

2006-11-06 11:22:57 · answer #10 · answered by Jimmy Pete 5 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers