2006-11-06 10:56:51 · 15 answers · asked by poodle 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
well he is a bit of a git, right?
2006-11-06 10:57:56 · update #1
Couldn't agree more (except that 'git' must be mildest form of abuse ever levelled at Mugabe!)
I'm sure as the authorities find out there's oil in Zimbabwe there'll be an invasion on humanitarian grounds and a kangeroo court set up quicker then you can say "hypocrites".
2006-11-06 11:01:19 · answer #1 · answered by satyricon_uk 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
it somewhat is genuine that George bush has dedicated crimes against humanity yet yet you could no longer hold close him as he's the president human beings of a (notwithstanding in case you do no longer handle him so). Now you could desire to have understood the distinction between developed worldwide places and coming up worldwide places. worldwide places that are developed can workout their ability on the arriving up worldwide places. in spite of the undeniable fact that i think of that george bush is feeling as though he's the only guy or woman who can do away with terrorism in this international. this is why he's appearing like that. I nonetheless ask your self why he has have been given a 2d time era as president human beings of a. perchance he has completed no blunders different than affirming wars on different worldwide places. Going via the present activities, i think of that Pakistan is next in line for an attack by way human beings of a ( George Bush)
2016-10-21 09:30:26 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Robert Mugabe was not tried along with Saddam Hussein.
2006-11-06 10:58:46 · answer #3 · answered by Harvie Ruth 5 · 1⤊ 5⤋
Nobody's going after Robert Mugabe for regime change - he hasn't got any oil!
Anyway - it's against international law to invade a country to establish 'regime change'!
2006-11-06 11:01:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
robert mugabe doesnt have any OIL. HE WILL GET WHATS COMING TO HIM
2006-11-06 11:40:21 · answer #5 · answered by species8472 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Africa is not rich in black gold,so Mugabe can kill as much as he likes Bush and his crew are not interested.
2006-11-06 11:06:32 · answer #6 · answered by Sherzade 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
He should have been dealt with long ago, a real scumbag who keeps his people in poverty so he can live in luxury.
I know it's politically incorrect but a small SAS team should take him out, perhaps a few more of the worlds scumbags would sit up and take note. Sometimes you have to fight fire with fire.
2006-11-06 11:02:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
What about him?
He does not pose any threat to the west (perceived or otherwise) so why should we have to deal with him? No one would thank us for it anyway.
He's an African problem. Let Africa deal with him, if they want to.
As for Oil. How much Oil is there in Bosnia? But we still went in to save them.
2006-11-06 12:06:43 · answer #8 · answered by Jack 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
He didn't make a death threat against Bush's father...
2006-11-06 11:15:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
that is the problem. Who will do that. In this partisan world in black Africa more atrocities were done by black leaders to black Africans than any one else.
2006-11-06 11:00:52 · answer #10 · answered by Rammohan 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋