We watched a movie about it in my science class a few years ago. There were a whole bunch of conspiracy theories. I thought it was pretty interesting.
There was another that said a spy plane over area 51 found what seemed to be like a movie producing area (with cameras and all that stuff), and that they took some photographs the the terrain matched that of what the supposed "moon" photos were.
There was another that said something about the crosshair of the camera on the photograph. I didnt really understand that one because Im not a photographer, but apparently they should have all been in front and half of it was behind the flag or something.
There was the flag one too.
Oh! And if you look into the fate of all the astronauts, the first ones that were around then or supposedly went to the moon all died suspiciously and suddenly. One guy had something dropped on his head or something.
All in all I think we have been to the moon by now, just we might not have been the first. Was America was so determined to get ahead of the Russian space program they could have faked their way into being first? Hmm, weird to think about. :D
2006-11-06 09:49:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by pittoresque 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Commander Swigert of the Apollo programme got here to NZ and that i requested him this question at a lecture. He replied; assume the Martians despatched an unmanned probe to Earth and it landed contained in the Nevada desert. it might take some pictures, study some soil samples yet when there have been Martians on board, that that they had stumble on that in basic terms over the horizon became the city of Las Vegas. ok, computerized probes are more effective smart now than they were decrease back then in 1972 in spite of the indisputable fact that an same argument nonetheless applies. yet I trust Nick S who says quickly television and so on will be so good that it really is going to be a twin of being there. keep in mind that action picture The staggering Voyage, about some docs shrinking themselves and taking a submarine experience by a affected human being's bloodstream? quickly we are going to be able to do more effective perfect than that. With holographic television, haptics (reproduction of the experience of contact) and some different techniques, you'd be able to regulate a microscopic sub, or interstellar probe, or pressure round Titan without the opportunity of exact being there yet with all the sensory inputs.
2016-11-28 20:39:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by sobczak 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Umm. no, it didn't flutter (not the way wind would make it flutter). .
on top of that, any such articles you've read are very whacked. . ignore them.
Next thing you know, you and those people who wrote the articles will start saying 911 never happened.
Sorry, too many witnesses and too many people involved intimately with the operation who would have spilt the beans already if any of what you say were fact.
Not a possibility.
2006-11-06 09:41:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Wayne A 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The flag moves because it is not a rigid material and just by placing it in the ground causes movement. That movement is not slowed down as much as it would be on the earth due to the moon's lesser gravity and the lack of wind resistance.
2006-11-06 09:54:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by volleyjacket 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Astronaut Neil Armstrong landed on the moon on July 20, 1969.
That's a fact. You can junked that article....
2006-11-06 09:49:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by dodadz 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The whole thing was filmed on a Hollywood sound stage, directed by Stanley Kubrick
2006-11-06 15:05:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jim T 6
·
0⤊
0⤋