English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Ok. Im having a VERY hard time figuring out the "theoretical yield of Alum." We took .997 g of aluminum scrap = .0370 mol. We ended up with 12.771 g of Alum (KAl(SO4)2 *12 H2O) which I **think** is .0269 mol (12.771g/474.2=.0269) So I took .997g * (.0370/.997)*(12.771/.0269)=17.6 However, if I take 12.771/17.6 my % yield is like 72% which CANT be right. I think Im messing up the formula and Dont know where.... Do any chemistry EXPERTS out there know what the heck Im doing wrong??? Please help me out. Thanks

2006-11-06 09:28:08 · 5 answers · asked by Angel Eve 6 in Science & Mathematics Chemistry

PS: The reaction is well behaved and a percent yield of near 100% should be expected. That is why 73% cant be right. Please let me know. Thanks

2006-11-06 09:52:34 · update #1

5 answers

A very rough check of your math indicates to me that you arrived at the correct figure, approx 72% . But you may want to recalculate to get a more accurate figure...given the problem's figures, you should report your answer to three significant figures, eg 72.3%.

When your math is correct, why question a very reasonable answer?...Apparently, your 'scrap' was a 72% Al alloy.
But if it IS an alloy, other metals present may be interfering...would need details of your analytical procedure to determine this.

One other possibility is that since some of the .12H2O is loosely held, you may have over-dried the product...to check that, re-wet it and dry it mildly, eg over silica gel.

Lots of 'figures' in above...your avatar has me thinking that figures figure...:-))

2006-11-06 10:08:02 · answer #1 · answered by L. A. L. 6 · 0 0

Umm...I'm not quite sure what you did with that calculation, but here's my work.

Your actual yield (multiply by 27 to convert to grams)
.12.771 g * ( 1 mol KAl(SO4)2 *12 H2O/ 474.2 g) * (1 mol Al/ 1 mol KAl(SO4)2 *12 H2O)= .0269 mol Al

Your theoretical yield is given by the sounds of it: .0370 mol Al

Your percent yield:
.0269 mol/.0370 mol * 100% = 73%

Either you're mistaken about the content of the aluminum scrap, you misread the periodic table (I don't have one with me, so I assumed you had the right molecular weight), or 73 is right. Why couldn't it be? You're not over 100%.

----

EDIT: Are you sure the scrap contains 100% aluminum and that you calculated the molecular masses correctly? If so, then you must have messed up during the experiment. It happens.

2006-11-06 09:45:18 · answer #2 · answered by answerator 5 · 0 0

once you think of with regards to the characteristics present in a real "soul mate" relationship, what one observe comes up maximum frequently on the astounding of your checklist? Is it Chemistry? in all probability. it somewhat is oftentimes defined as a feeling that leaves you breathless, excited and vulnerable interior the knees. palms sweat, the midsection races and the physique tingles with worried anticipation. the tip maximum would-be fans come to is that in the event that they adventure those intense emotions in the direction of somebody, they have the inspiration for an ideal and lasting relationship. precise? in line with probability no longer. For this definition of chemistry is limited to one's actual reaction to a distinctive individual. It lacks an entire length it is residing in our values, ideals, personalities and worldview. with the intention to be attentive to you have the astounding connection with a ability (or present) companion, it is significant to have a complication-loose know-how of what actual chemistry includes, that encompass it. it somewhat is confusing to do. This intense, actual pastime is the stuff that Oscar triumphing video clips and ultimate-merchandising books are made up of. So, take a step lower back for a minute and spot in case you be attentive to your self. :-)

2016-12-10 03:48:50 · answer #3 · answered by minissale 4 · 0 0

Sorry, you're way over my head but I read your profile about treating children with cancer and to that I say ... thank you. My oldest granddaughter has been receiving treatment for T-cell Lymphoma now for 3 years at St Judes and they're all miracle workers there. She's been cancer free now for almost a year. Good luck with your future!!

2006-11-06 09:33:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I did the calculation another way (using the percentage of Al in Alum) and got the same number you have: 72.9%.

Did you cool the stuff?

2006-11-06 11:12:58 · answer #5 · answered by Dr. J. 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers