English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

- No one is allowed to see how the votes are counted (as if it should be secret)
- No Paper trail.
- In a close race with no recount, knocking down a power line in a minority (Democrat) neighborhood prevents all those people's votes from getting counted.

Should we even bother voting at all?

It matters not who votes, but who counts the votes.


http://flushaholybook.com

2006-11-06 09:04:54 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

24 answers

Man, am I ever tired of hearing all this whiney cry-baby liberal rhetoric garbage from those whose candidate lost the last election by rules that have been in place for decades.

But... if you feel your vote doesn't count, by all means, don't show up at the voting booth!

2006-11-06 09:10:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

THE DIEBOLT PRODUCED VOTING MACHINES ARE RIGGED. The optical scan voting machines being used in Ohio's largest county did not work properly on May 2, 2006. That's because Diebolt decided not to test them until May 1. The day before the election. These are the machines that are used to count absentee ballots. A hand count is now underway.

After the Sec. Of State (Republican Kennyboy Blackwell), who cut the deal to buy these flawed voting machines, realized many people would be voting by absentee ballot the fix was in.
As a share holder in the Diebolt company the Republican candidate for Ohio governor(Blackwell) was illegally making money on the deal. In the corrupt world of Ohio politics this is nothing new. When you conceder that the owner of Diebolt assured George Bush of victory in the '04 presidential election. With Blackwell as the top election official in the state and rigged voting machines in place, Ohio was given to Bush. With Ohio went the election.

2006-11-06 09:15:37 · answer #2 · answered by Tony K 1 · 2 0

w. bush did not rig it. he's not that sensible. not being sensible is why others rigged it for him. it really is way less complicated to cajole a dumb president to promote out the rustic than a sensible one. Jim Baker between the marketing campaign brains certain a bush victory presently after the Florida polls closed. it really is even as no one else contained in the rustic became particular of the end result. He knew because they rigged the election by technique of dissallowing the votes in black parts of Florida which usually voted Democratic. That became the version contained in the election. even as Congressmen objected to the election outcomes even as certifying the elctoral college they needed the help of one unmarried Democratic Senator for the objection to be considered. Al Gore as vp became presiding. No Democratic Senator supported a unmarried objection. the reason they did not became because Al Gore requested them now to not. He gave up the Presidency so the rustic does not be torn assunder over the subsequent 4 months and be with none president except Clinton remained previous his time period. because of this Gore deserved the Nobel Peace Prize, inspite of what else he did. the U. S. excellent courtroom became full of Republicans, Scalia is a own buddy of the Bush relations and Clarence Thomas's spouse worked for the bush marketing campaign. both must have reclused themselves from judgements affecting the election. they did not. So what befell to this u . s . a . then? 911 because bush not in any respect met with Richard Clark who would have informed him about the chance. Deregulation of Banking and Wall street that led to our economic equipment to crash and burn. A ineffective warfare that made Haliburton evern richer and over 4000 youthful individuals useless with tens of thousands more effective wounded. that is the bush legacy and that i'm particular if Gore had prevalent how issues would have grew to change into out, he would have allowed some Senator to help the objection to the election outcomes. we would were a lot more effective perfect for it. and those youthful who died, would were elevating households now.

2016-11-28 20:38:24 · answer #3 · answered by sobczak 4 · 0 0

I recently worked in the office of the registrar of voters... each counties registrar is the one who is responsible for makeing sure there is a paper trail of the votes made in thier county. All the machines have their own power source and are NEVER connected to any other type of electronics or machinenery. Each voting unit contains a data card that stores the information from the ballots and cannot be tampered with. There is always at least 2 people at a time with any equiptment and data card. Once the cards are pulled from the unit at the end of the night, it is placed immediately into a lock box.
Believe me, we spent a lot of time makeing sure that our equiptment was tamper proof before we spen the money on them. There is no way Bush could rig and election without there being a lot of people involved... the Registrar of voters as well as the company who produces the units and a whole long trail of people would have to be involved for that to happen.

2006-11-06 09:24:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Oh are you trying to compare Mr. Bush to John F. Kennedy when he had his mafia buddies threaten people to vote for him instead of Richard Nixon, like when Kennedy rigged the election?
Why would he need to rig anything? He's the President. What do you think, he might take a special secret trip to California to switch ballots to make sure Arnold Swartzeneegar will be re-elected?
It doesn't matter if you vote or not, someone else will, and then it won't matter what you would have voted for, because it will be too late for you. You lost your chance to have your say, and it will be all your fault. Will you blame George Bush for that, too?

2006-11-06 09:13:26 · answer #5 · answered by xenypoo 4 · 2 1

Let's go down the electoin checklist:

Left-wing conspiracy nutjobs - Check!

Remember the good old days of the 2000 election, with the endless recounts and lawsuits? Will we see those again?

Anyway, I remember what I consider perhaps the finest demonstration of liberty in recent years, during those recounts. When in Miami Dade, the election workers were taking ballots into a smaller room to count, where observers would not watch, and the Republicans turned into a mob shouting "Let us in" in the hallway. Because of the turmoil, the guys running the recounts had to reverse their decision and move counting back into the bigger room where people from each side could observe.

2006-11-06 09:15:22 · answer #6 · answered by Uncle Pennybags 7 · 2 2

We should vote , but they will probably still rig the elections , after all that's what this country has become all about in the last eight years . But by voting at least you are trying .

2006-11-06 09:26:32 · answer #7 · answered by Az rastaman 2 · 1 0

No, you should not bother voting at all. It IS a waste of time! Don't do it! (And if, God forbid, Democrats, I am certain that means that the election was rigged! There are more registered Democrats who've been dead for years than most of us know about.)

But remember, Democrats, he is absolutely right! It's a waste of time to vote tomorrow!

2006-11-06 09:11:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

No, its not going to be rigged because I think everyone knows and expects the Republicans to lose this election in a landslide. Democrats are going to kick some butt this time.

2006-11-06 09:14:22 · answer #9 · answered by James F 2 · 1 2

I read it on the Internet, so it MUST be true.

Since you believe anything that is on the Internet, read this...

You're a brainless moron if you believe that drivel.
I know you have a real hard time understanding that not everyone thinks like you do, but THANK GOD they don't!
You lost the last 2 elections fair & square.
Get over it!

2006-11-06 09:15:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers