English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

34 answers

Hey Skycat,

Good art sells, bad art stays with the artist. That is one way. A little snooty but that is how it is judged in the world.

Here are some criteria anyway.

2006-11-06 09:05:31 · answer #1 · answered by BuyTheSeaProperty 7 · 3 1

"Good" art usually attempts to push the boundary of expression. It is less about 'craftsmanship' and 'beauty', and more about emotion, exploration, and the response it gets from the artist and viewer alike. Art can be beautiful, ugly, shocking, erotic, political, thought provoking, etc. Yes, some 'art' is largely a scam. But the great artists always have something to say, some vision to express, rather than just paint a picture or make a statue.

Edit - "Bad" art, on the other hand, is almost harder to define. It might be descibed as art created only for sale. Or, art that does not push the boundaries of creativity, is dirivitive, or melodramatic. It also lacks any craftsmanship or ability.

2006-11-06 09:08:40 · answer #2 · answered by Wundt 7 · 1 1

Well the way I see it, you and I look at a piece of art and know immediately "That's good I'll bet that artist has a lot of talent to produce work like that" or "That's a pile of shite, What a feckin chancer, no talent waste of gallery space". But in fairness who listens to us, we can't afford to buy this stuff anyway
Now art critics on the other hand will say anything to justify their made up jobs while they have their heads so far up their backsides they can't tell a pile of bricks from a Caravaggio
Just my opinion mind you, but when I go into a gallery and see a 12' by 8' canvas with a blue line and an orange line on it and it is called "peace and tranquility" or something and is yours for a cool 50,000 quid then that really devalues the efforts of my young lad who just drew a brilliant picture of a rocket car under the sea that was miles better but he couldn't give it away. Turner prize my eye ! Turner would be turning in his grave

2006-11-06 09:17:24 · answer #3 · answered by Yeah yeah yeah 5 · 2 1

Read
What Good Are The Arts? by John Carey

This is a little book that asks: “What is art?”

It kicks off by demolishing the “sacred” aura that surrounds art objects and which, he says, makes hurtful assumptions about “superior and inferior” refinements that reflect on those who do or don’t appreciate them.

His answer, in essence, is that nearly everything written about the value of art is nonsense. “A work of art is anything that anyone has ever considered a work of art, although it may be a work of art only for that one person,” he concludes.

2006-11-06 09:09:03 · answer #4 · answered by marblemelody 3 · 1 1

Good Art is hanging somewhere for the Public while Bad Art is
up in someones attic or garage. Really it is in the eyes of the
beholder same as Beauty.

2006-11-06 09:47:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Good art should have sum kind of meaning to u bad art is jus there and isnt purposeful to anyone and isnt purposeful to the creator so there wasnt a reason to make the art in the first place.

2006-11-06 09:36:50 · answer #6 · answered by shorty_frm_ga 4 · 1 1

Learning to be a master of pulling portraits is simple with the help of Realistic Pencil Portrait Mastery guide from here https://tr.im/PNzKg .
With Realistic Pencil Portrait Mastery guide you will got that called Lesson Brain Routes and each of this training is sold with what're called “Process” or “Mind” maps. They're primarily outline summaries of the thing that was protected in each of the lessons.
With Realistic Pencil Portrait Mastery you will also obtain 100 High Resolution Research Pictures since in the event that you are likely to exercise your portrait drawing, then you are going to require guide pictures. That advantage includes 100 good quality dark and white pictures made up of 70 faces and 30 skin features. Very useful!

2016-04-27 12:36:16 · answer #7 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

If it touches you emotionally in some way... If it touches lots of people then perhaps the Artist has hit on a good idea and could be considered good art?

2006-11-08 04:59:15 · answer #8 · answered by youdancin 2 · 0 0

You can't really. I've seen some pretty horrible "art" sell for a lot of money. At the same time something that looks quite good to me is probably worth nothing at all. I think you have to make a name for yourself to sell "art". Picasso couldn't draw face n the right proportions, yet his paintings are worth a fortune.

2006-11-06 09:06:35 · answer #9 · answered by Sparky 3 · 1 1

You know it's good art when you look at whatever it is, and someone else looks at it, and you both got something totally different from it...
Honestly, especially in the abstract art world, the only one who knows the true meaning is the artist themselves...and really all they care about is their idea reaching someone...whether it's one person or one million people.

2006-11-06 19:31:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers