English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-11-06 07:33:22 · 39 answers · asked by mickladd 2 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

JAYSUS that stirred yous up i love a good **** stirring question keep the coming...

2006-11-06 07:42:30 · update #1

39 answers

Dont worry it will probably end up on Ogrish

2006-11-06 07:38:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Culterally it would be an exciting adventure by using fact u . s . of america hasn't performed a awesome in quiet a while. yet i'm uncertain if a public awesome could be interior the proper activity of the international. I propose there are those that help Saddam and there are people who're against him, i merely think of it would reason so lots greater rigidity, and a danger greater deaths. If there wasnt the type of danger, i think of it would be exciting to be sure.

2016-12-28 14:36:59 · answer #2 · answered by jamila 3 · 0 0

I was wondering if someone would ask this !

I'm not sure - Not for reason's of taste & decency, but for the reason it could turn him into a martyre. The sight of him dying could create all kinds of violence in Iraq and may even give him iconic status.

If they do decide to show it, would I watch it? Well I hate to say it, but part of me would want to. There is no dispute that he is (was) a violent dictator and there is that human element of morbid curiosity.

2006-11-06 07:46:08 · answer #3 · answered by David 5 · 1 0

No way. He doesn't need any more publicity,
If he has to be hung, then it should be done in some lonely place with very few people around to witness it.
If it was televised it would only incite his supporters to go on the rampage and give him the status of martyr .

2006-11-06 07:38:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

It seems perverse that American TV networks would censor the exposure of a female breast but at the same time endorse broadcast a man's execution. I don't know what moral authority could reconcile these two views.

2006-11-06 07:41:13 · answer #5 · answered by imnogeniusbutt 4 · 2 0

Yes! Can we have George Bush being whipped with a cat o' nine tails by rabid cheerleaders during the half time interval?

2006-11-06 07:35:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I think they should Pay-Per-View it. The money they raise would help pay for all the wasted money we have spent dropping bombs over there. They could have some warm up hangings to get the crowd going!

2006-11-06 07:35:58 · answer #7 · answered by biggimpin 3 · 1 1

No. It is disgusting to take pleasure in watching somebody's death. Even somebody as evil as him. And if his followers were to see that televised, it could only cause more anger and hatred and they could retaliate even more than they already do.

2006-11-06 07:35:52 · answer #8 · answered by Hollz 3 · 2 0

Of course not! Why do you think they don't show beheadings by the opposition? Because it's obscene and negates your right to call yourself a decent human being! Why would you even want to see that?????????????

2006-11-06 07:38:37 · answer #9 · answered by scotslad60 4 · 1 0

No way! Surely getting some kind of sadistic pleasure out of seeing him in pain is as bad as he is?

2006-11-06 07:40:54 · answer #10 · answered by Fairy Jenna 2 · 1 0

No, because it seems to me to glorify death is very very wrong, Do we need to bring ourselves to that level. Lets not make a martyr out of someone who arguably should not!

2006-11-06 07:39:47 · answer #11 · answered by janeylizzybee 1 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers